05.11.2014 Views

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is no credibility for arguments such as ‗there is no other explanation‘ [than anthropogenic<br />

generation of carbon dioxide]. This must be remembered when making future political<br />

decisions related to these matters.‖ (LINK) Stilbs also was one of the signatories of the<br />

December 13, 2007 letter critical of the UN IPCC‘s climate view. ―These [IPCC]<br />

Summaries are prepared by a relatively small core writing team with the final drafts<br />

approved line-by-line by government representatives. The great majority of IPCC<br />

contributors and reviewers, and the tens of thousands of other scientists who are qualified<br />

to comment on these matters, are not involved in the preparation of these documents. The<br />

summaries therefore cannot properly be represented as a consensus view among experts,"<br />

the letter Stilbs signed explained. (LINK)<br />

Geography professor Dr. Randy Cerveny of Arizona State University oversees the<br />

university‟s meteorology program and was named to a key post at the UN‟s World<br />

Meteorological Organization in 2007. Cerveny, who has written nearly 100 scientific<br />

papers and magazine articles, is in charge of developing a global weather archive for<br />

the UN. He was also a contributing author to the skeptical climate change book<br />

Shattered Consensus: The True State of <strong>Global</strong> Warming, edited by climatologist Dr.<br />

Patrick Michaels. Cerveny rejected catastrophic fears of man-made climate change in<br />

2007. "I don't think [global warming] is going to be catastrophic,‖ Cerveny said according<br />

to an October 7, 2007 article. "Hopefully, our grandkids are going to have a lot better<br />

weather information than we did, and they will be able to answer a lot of the questions<br />

we're just in the process of asking," Cerveny explained. (LINK) & (LINK)<br />

Award-winning NASA Astronaut and Physicist Walter Cunningham of NASA‟s<br />

Apollo 7. was awarded the NASA Exceptional Distinguished Service Medal and Navy<br />

Astronaut Wings and is a member of the American Geophysical Union and fellow of<br />

the American Astronautical Society. (Bio Link) Cunningham, a long time skeptic, again<br />

rejected climate fears in 2008. ―It doesn‘t help that NASA scientist James Hansen was one<br />

of the early alarmists claiming humans caused global warming. Hansen is a political<br />

activist who spreads fear even when NASA‘s own data contradict him,‖ Cunningham wrote<br />

in an essay in the July/August 2008 issue of Launch Magazine. ―NASA should be at the<br />

forefront in the collection of scientific evidence and debunking the current hysteria over<br />

human-caused, or Anthropogenic <strong>Global</strong> Warming (AGW). Unfortunately, it is becoming<br />

just another agency caught up in the politics of global warming, or worse, politicized<br />

science. Advocacy is replacing objective evaluation of data, while scientific data is being<br />

ignored in favor of emotions and politics,‖ he explained. ―I do see hopeful signs that some<br />

true believers are beginning to harbor doubts about AGW. Let‘s hope that NASA can focus<br />

the global warming discussion back on scientific evidence before we perpetrate an<br />

economic disaster on ourselves,‖ he added. ―The reality is that atmospheric CO2 has a<br />

minimal impact on greenhouse gases and world temperature. Water vapor is responsible for<br />

95 percent of the greenhouse effect. CO2 contributes just 3.6 percent, with human activity<br />

responsible for only 3.2 percent of that. That is why some studies claim CO2 levels are<br />

largely irrelevant to global warming. Without the greenhouse effect to keep our world<br />

warm, the planet would have an average temperature of minus 18 degrees Celsius. Because<br />

we do have it, the temperature is a comfortable plus 15 degrees Celsius. Based on the<br />

seasonal and geographic distribution of any projected warming, a good case can be made<br />

that a warmer average temperature would be even more beneficial for humans,‖ he<br />

concluded. (LINK)<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!