Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Group 1 report) is to enable them to make any ‗necessary' adjustments to the technical<br />
report to match the policy summary. Unbelievable. Can you imagine what securities<br />
commissions would say if business promoters issued a big promotion and then the<br />
promoters made the ‗necessary' adjustments to the qualifying reports and financial<br />
statements so that they matched the promotion. Words fail me," McIntyre explained<br />
January 2007. (LINK)<br />
A Panel of Broadcast Meteorologists Rejected <strong>Man</strong>-<strong>Made</strong> <strong>Global</strong> Warming Fears in<br />
2007 - Claimed 95% of TV Meteorologists Skeptical. "You tell me you're going to<br />
predict climate change based on 100 years of data for a rock that's 6 billion years old?"<br />
Meteorologist Mark Johnson said. Johnson dismissed the 2007 UN IPCC summary for<br />
policymakers, "Consensus does not mean fact. ... Don't drink the Kool-Aid." Meteorologist<br />
Mark Nolan said, "I'm not sure which is more arrogant - to say we caused [global<br />
warming] or that we can fix it." Johnson and Nolan were joined on the panel by fellow<br />
Ohio meteorologists Dan Webster, Dick Goddard, and John Loufman in dismissing<br />
fears of global warming, according to Crain's Cleveland publication on February 13, 2007.<br />
"Mr. Webster observed that in his dealings with meteorologists nationwide, ‗about 95%'<br />
share his skepticism about global warming," the paper reported. Goddard noted that<br />
scientists have flip-flopped on climate issues before. "I have a file an inch thick from 30<br />
years ago that says the planet was cooling," Goddard explained. Webster jokingly<br />
referenced former Vice President Gore. "Where's Al Gore now? You can bet he's not in<br />
New York, where they've got nearly 12 feet of snow right now," Webster joked to the<br />
crowd of several hundred.<br />
Polar expert Ivan Frolov, the head of Russia's Science and Research Institute of<br />
Arctic and Antarctic Regions, said atmospheric temperature would have to much higher<br />
to make continental glaciers melt. "<strong>Man</strong>y hundred years or 20-30 degree temperature rise<br />
would have made glaciers melt," Frolov said in a December 14, 2006 Russian news article.<br />
(LINK) Frolov noted that currently Greenland's and Antarctic glaciers have the tendency to<br />
grow. The article explained, "Frolov says cooling and warming periods are common for<br />
our planet - temperature fluctuations amounted to 10-12 degrees. However, such<br />
fluctuations haven't caused glaciers to melt. Thus, we shouldn't be afraid they melt today."<br />
Atmospheric scientist Dr. William R. Cotton of the Department of Atmospheric<br />
Science at Colorado State University, an internationally respected expert in the<br />
aerosol effects on weather and climate, called claims that man-made global warming was<br />
causing any recent abnormal weather an "abuse of limited scientific knowledge." Cotton,<br />
who has been extensively cited in the peer reviewed literature, rejected global warming<br />
alarmism on October 17, 2006 in Climate Science. "Climate variability has been with Earth<br />
for eons. Greenhouse warming is only one factor affecting climate change. There are many<br />
other factors some associated with human activity, many not, and not all processes<br />
associated with climate variability have been quantitatively identified," Cotton said.<br />
"Therefore I am skeptical about claims of forecasts of what the climate will be like in say,<br />
5, 10 years or more. I also view claims that a few years of abnormal weather (like intense<br />
hurricane landfalls, severe storms and floods, and droughts) to be caused by human activity<br />
as abuse of limited scientific knowledge." (LINK)<br />
204