05.11.2014 Views

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Group 1 report) is to enable them to make any ‗necessary' adjustments to the technical<br />

report to match the policy summary. Unbelievable. Can you imagine what securities<br />

commissions would say if business promoters issued a big promotion and then the<br />

promoters made the ‗necessary' adjustments to the qualifying reports and financial<br />

statements so that they matched the promotion. Words fail me," McIntyre explained<br />

January 2007. (LINK)<br />

A Panel of Broadcast Meteorologists Rejected <strong>Man</strong>-<strong>Made</strong> <strong>Global</strong> Warming Fears in<br />

2007 - Claimed 95% of TV Meteorologists Skeptical. "You tell me you're going to<br />

predict climate change based on 100 years of data for a rock that's 6 billion years old?"<br />

Meteorologist Mark Johnson said. Johnson dismissed the 2007 UN IPCC summary for<br />

policymakers, "Consensus does not mean fact. ... Don't drink the Kool-Aid." Meteorologist<br />

Mark Nolan said, "I'm not sure which is more arrogant - to say we caused [global<br />

warming] or that we can fix it." Johnson and Nolan were joined on the panel by fellow<br />

Ohio meteorologists Dan Webster, Dick Goddard, and John Loufman in dismissing<br />

fears of global warming, according to Crain's Cleveland publication on February 13, 2007.<br />

"Mr. Webster observed that in his dealings with meteorologists nationwide, ‗about 95%'<br />

share his skepticism about global warming," the paper reported. Goddard noted that<br />

scientists have flip-flopped on climate issues before. "I have a file an inch thick from 30<br />

years ago that says the planet was cooling," Goddard explained. Webster jokingly<br />

referenced former Vice President Gore. "Where's Al Gore now? You can bet he's not in<br />

New York, where they've got nearly 12 feet of snow right now," Webster joked to the<br />

crowd of several hundred.<br />

Polar expert Ivan Frolov, the head of Russia's Science and Research Institute of<br />

Arctic and Antarctic Regions, said atmospheric temperature would have to much higher<br />

to make continental glaciers melt. "<strong>Man</strong>y hundred years or 20-30 degree temperature rise<br />

would have made glaciers melt," Frolov said in a December 14, 2006 Russian news article.<br />

(LINK) Frolov noted that currently Greenland's and Antarctic glaciers have the tendency to<br />

grow. The article explained, "Frolov says cooling and warming periods are common for<br />

our planet - temperature fluctuations amounted to 10-12 degrees. However, such<br />

fluctuations haven't caused glaciers to melt. Thus, we shouldn't be afraid they melt today."<br />

Atmospheric scientist Dr. William R. Cotton of the Department of Atmospheric<br />

Science at Colorado State University, an internationally respected expert in the<br />

aerosol effects on weather and climate, called claims that man-made global warming was<br />

causing any recent abnormal weather an "abuse of limited scientific knowledge." Cotton,<br />

who has been extensively cited in the peer reviewed literature, rejected global warming<br />

alarmism on October 17, 2006 in Climate Science. "Climate variability has been with Earth<br />

for eons. Greenhouse warming is only one factor affecting climate change. There are many<br />

other factors some associated with human activity, many not, and not all processes<br />

associated with climate variability have been quantitatively identified," Cotton said.<br />

"Therefore I am skeptical about claims of forecasts of what the climate will be like in say,<br />

5, 10 years or more. I also view claims that a few years of abnormal weather (like intense<br />

hurricane landfalls, severe storms and floods, and droughts) to be caused by human activity<br />

as abuse of limited scientific knowledge." (LINK)<br />

204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!