Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
French climatologist Dr. Marcel Leroux, former professor at University of Jean<br />
Moulin and former director of the Laboratory of Climatology, Risks, and<br />
Environment (CNRS) in Lyon, is a climate skeptic. Leroux wrote a 2005 book titled<br />
<strong>Global</strong> Warming - Myth or Reality? - The Erring Ways of Climatology. "Hardly a week<br />
goes by without some new scoop ... filling our screens and the pages of our newspapers,"<br />
Leroux wrote in his book. The media promotes the view that "global warming caused by<br />
the greenhouse effect is our fault, just like everything else, and the<br />
message/slogan/misinformation becomes even more simplistic, ever cruder! It could not be<br />
simpler: if the rain falls or draught strikes; if the wind blows a gale or there is none at all;<br />
whether it's heat or hard frost; it's all because of the greenhouse effect, and we are to blame.<br />
An easy argument, but stupid!" he explained. "The Fourth Report of the IPCC might just<br />
as well decree the suppression of all climatology textbooks, and replace them in our<br />
schools with press communiqués. ... Day after day, the same mantra - that ‗the Earth is<br />
warming up' - is churned out in all its forms. As ‗the ice melts' and ‗sea level rises,' the<br />
Apocalypse looms ever nearer! Without realizing it, or perhaps without wishing to, the<br />
average citizen in bamboozled, lobotomized, lulled into mindless acceptance. ... Nonbelievers<br />
in the greenhouse scenario are in the position of those long ago who doubted the<br />
existence of God ... fortunately for them, the Inquisition is no longer with us!" he wrote.<br />
"The possible causes, then, of climate change are: well-established orbital parameters on<br />
the paleoclimatic scale, ... solar activity, ...; volcanism ...; and far at the rear, the<br />
greenhouse effect, and in particular that caused by water vapor, the extent of its influence<br />
being unknown. These factors are working together all the time, and it seems difficult to<br />
unravel the relative importance of their respective influences upon climatic evolution.<br />
Equally, it is tendentious to highlight the anthropogenic factor, which is, clearly, the least<br />
credible among all those previously mentioned," he added. (LINK) (Leroux died in August<br />
2008)<br />
Climate scientist Dr. Chris de Freitas of the University of Auckland, N.Z., also<br />
converted from a believer in man-made global warming to a skeptic. "At first I accepted<br />
that increases in human-caused additions of carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere<br />
would trigger changes in water vapor, etc. and lead to dangerous ‗global warming,' but with<br />
time and with the results of research, I formed the view that, although it makes for a good<br />
story, it is unlikely that the man-made changes are drivers of significant climate variation,"<br />
de Freitas wrote on August 17, 2006. "I accept there may be small changes. But I see the<br />
risk of anything serious to be minute," he added. "One could reasonably argue that lack of<br />
evidence is not a good reason for complacency. But I believe the billions of dollars<br />
committed to GW research and lobbying for GW and for Kyoto treaties etc could be better<br />
spent on uncontroversial and very real environmental problems (such as air pollution, poor<br />
sanitation, provision of clean water and improved health services) that we know affect tens<br />
of millions of people," de Freitas concluded. De Freitas was one of the 60 scientists who<br />
wrote an April 6, 2006 letter urging withdrawal of Kyoto to Canadian Prime Minister<br />
Stephen Harper which stated in part, "Significant [scientific] advances have been made<br />
since the [Kyoto] protocol was created, many of which are taking us away from a concern<br />
about increasing greenhouse gases." (LINK)<br />
Atmospheric scientist Dr. Gerhard Kramm of the Geophysical Institute at the<br />
University of Alaska Fairbanks expressed climate skepticism in 2007. "The IPCC would<br />
never be awarded by the Nobel Prize in Physics because most of the statements of the<br />
192