05.11.2014 Views

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

"The most potent greenhouse gas is water, explains Shaidurov, and it is this compound on<br />

which his study focuses. According to Shaidurov, only small changes in the atmospheric<br />

levels of water, in the form of vapour and ice crystals can contribute to significant changes<br />

to the temperature of the earth's surface, which far outweighs the effects of carbon dioxide<br />

and other gases released by human activities. Just a rise of 1% of water vapour could raise<br />

the global average temperature of Earth's surface more then 4 degrees Celsius." The release<br />

concluded, "Shaidurov has concluded that only an enormous natural phenomenon, such as<br />

an asteroid or comet impact or airburst, could seriously disturb atmospheric water levels,<br />

destroying persistent so-called 'silver', or noctilucent, clouds composed of ice crystals in the<br />

high altitude mesosphere (50 to 85km)." (LINK)<br />

Dr. Ross McKitrick, Associate Professor of Environmental Economics at the<br />

University of Guelph, is author or coauthor of dozens of peer-reviewed papers in both<br />

economics and climate science journals. McKitrick, a UN IPCC expert reviewer, and<br />

one of the de-bunkers of the IPCC “hockey stick” graph, is coauthor of the prizewinning<br />

best-seller Taken By Storm: The Troubled Science, Policy and Politics of<br />

<strong>Global</strong> Warming. In an essay published on December 5, 2007 in the National Post, he<br />

describes new research that shows the IPCC surface temperature record is exaggerated.<br />

"The data come from thermometers around the world, but between the thermometer<br />

readings and the final, famous, warming ramp, a lot of statistical modeling aims at<br />

removing known sources of exaggeration in the warming trend. In a new article in the<br />

December 2007 issue of the peer-reviewed Journal of Geophysical Research, Climatologist<br />

Dr. Patrick Michaels and McKitrick concluded that the temperature manipulations for the<br />

steep post-1980 period are inadequate, and the [IPCC] graph is an exaggeration. McKitrick<br />

believes that the United Nations agency promoting the global temperature graph has made<br />

"false claims about the quality of its data." McKitrick reports in this new, peer-reviewed<br />

study that data contamination problems "account for about half the surface warming<br />

measured over land since 1980." (LINK) & (LINK) & (LINK)<br />

Meteorologist Gary England, who pioneered the use of Doppler radar weatherforecasting,<br />

dismisses climate fears. "The climate has always been changing and it will<br />

most likely always continue to change. In the distant past, we have been much colder than<br />

we are now and we have been much warmer than we are now. And all of that happened<br />

many times without humans," England wrote on July 1, 2007 in an article in Associated<br />

Content. "Here in Oklahoma we're a little warmer than we were 30 years ago. Recently we<br />

ended a two year drought and it has been replaced with significant, long duration rains. Is<br />

all of this a result of global warming? Maybe it is and maybe it isn't. You see, no one really<br />

knows. If they say they do, I suggest that person is confused at best or has an agenda at the<br />

worst," England explained. "An examination of ice core data is frequently used as proof<br />

that CO2 heats the atmosphere. A close examination of that data shows that the air<br />

temperature went up first and then the CO2 went up. Mars is loosing pole ice faster that<br />

earth is loosing the same. As someone said recently, ‗It's the sun stupid!' Recent research<br />

suggests that the activity of our sun combined with cosmic radiation from far outside our<br />

galaxy interact with our atmosphere to produce effects never dreamed of a few years ago.<br />

Is anything or everything in this paragraph correct? Nobody really knows," he concluded.<br />

(LINK)<br />

266

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!