Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
of the warming, if it comes, will be during winters and at night and toward the poles. For<br />
most life in the oceans, warming means faster growth, reduced energy requirements to stay<br />
warm, lower winter mortalities, and wider ranges of distribution," he explained. "No one<br />
knows whether the Earth is going to keep warming, or since reaching a peak in 1998, we<br />
are at the start of a cooling cycle that will last several decades or more," Everett concluded.<br />
Everett also worked for the National Marine Fisheries Service as Division Chief for<br />
Fisheries Development in the 1970s and he noted that the concern then was about how<br />
predicted global cooling would impact the oceans. (LINK) & (LINK)<br />
Physicist Dr. Syun-Ichi Akasofu, the former director of both University of Alaska<br />
Fairbanks' Geophysical Institute and <strong>International</strong> Arctic Research Center who has<br />
twice been named in "<strong>1000</strong> Most Cited <strong>Scientists</strong>," released a scientific study of the<br />
Arctic on March 2007 that concluded the recent warming was likely "natural" and not<br />
manmade. (LINK) Akasofu, an award winning scientist who has published more than 550<br />
professional journal articles and authored or co-authored 10 books, also recently blasted the<br />
UN IPCC process. "I think the initial motivation by the IPCC (established in 1988) was<br />
good; it was an attempt to promote this particular scientific field," Akasofu said in an April<br />
1, 2007 interview. "But so many [scientists] jumped in, and the media is looking for a<br />
disaster story, and the whole thing got out of control," Akasofu added. The article<br />
continued: "Akasofu said there is no data showing that ‗most' of the present warming is due<br />
to the man-made greenhouse effect, as the members of the Intergovernmental Panel on<br />
Climate Change wrote in February. "If you look back far enough, we have a bunch of data<br />
that show that warming has gone on from the 1600s with an almost linear increase to the<br />
present," Akasofu said. The article concluded: "Akasofu said scientists who support the<br />
man-made greenhouse gas theory disregard information from centuries ago when exploring<br />
the issue of global warming. Satellite images of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean have been<br />
available in the satellite era only since the 1960s and 1970s. ‗Young researchers are<br />
interested in satellite data, which became available after 1975,' he said. ‗All the papers<br />
since (the advent of satellites) show warming. That's what I call 'instant climatology.' I'm<br />
trying to tell young scientists, 'You can't study climatology unless you look at a much<br />
longer time period.'" (LINK)<br />
Physicist Dr. Gerhard Gerlich, of the Institute of Mathematical Physics at the<br />
Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina in Braunschweig in Germany, and Dr. Ralf<br />
D. Tscheuschner co-authored a July 7, 2007 paper titled "Falsification of the<br />
Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within the Frame of Physics." The abstract of<br />
the paper reads in part, "(a) there are no common physical laws between the warming<br />
phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric greenhouse effects; (b) there are<br />
no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet; (c) the frequently<br />
mentioned difference of 33 C is a meaningless number calculated wrongly; (d) the formulas<br />
of cavity radiation are used inappropriately; (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is<br />
unphysical; (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric<br />
greenhouse conjecture is falsified." Gerlich and Tscheuschner's study concluded, "The<br />
horror visions of a risen sea level, melting pole caps and developing deserts in North<br />
America and in Europe are fictitious consequences of fictitious physical mechanisms, as<br />
they cannot be seen even in the climate model computations. The emergence of hurricanes<br />
and tornados cannot be predicted by climate models, because all of these deviations are<br />
ruled out. The main strategy of modern CO2-greenhouse gas defenders seems to hide<br />
178