Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
is only a fraction of, is not to blame for global warming,‖ Heiss explained. ―Carbon dioxide<br />
is not responsible for the warming of the global climate over the last 150 years. But what<br />
then? For more than 90 percent are changes in the Earth-Sun relationship to the climate<br />
fluctuations. One is the sun's activities themselves, such as the recently discovered 22-yearcycles<br />
occur and sunspots,‖ Heiss continued. ―Looking at the climate history of our planet,<br />
it is clear to see - and quite reassuring with regard to the possible consequences of global<br />
warming as predicted by the IPCC -- that we are now (more precisely, in the last two to<br />
three million years ago) in a very cold climate period. Any warming would give us only the<br />
best long-term climate of the last 560 million years back,‖ he added. ―Moreover, despite all<br />
the proposed measures and their enormous costs, most professional economic studies<br />
indicate that warmer times are generally better,‖ he concluded. (translated) (LINK)<br />
Economist Dr. Arnold Kling, formerly of the Federal Reserve Board and Freddie<br />
Mac, expressed man-made climate skepticism in 2007. ―I am worried about climate<br />
change. In one respect, I may be more worried than other people. I am worried because I<br />
have very little confidence that we know what is causing it,‖ Kling wrote in a December<br />
21, 2007 commentary. ―One of my fears is that we could reduce carbon emissions by some<br />
drastic amount, only to discover that--oops--it turns out that climate change is being caused<br />
by something else,‖ Kling explained. ―I am not a skeptic about the rise in average<br />
temperatures. Nor am I skeptical that the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has<br />
been increasing. However, I remain skeptical about the connection between the two,‖ he<br />
wrote. (LINK)<br />
Dr. R. W. Bradnock, former Head of Department of Geography at the School of<br />
Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) and currently a Senior Visiting Research Fellow<br />
at King‟s College London (KCL), has published field-based research on sea level and<br />
environmental change and dissented in 2008. ―In my own narrow area of research, I know<br />
that many of the claims about the impact of ‗global warming‘ in Bangladesh, for example,<br />
are completely unfounded. There is no evidence that flooding has increased at all in recent<br />
years. Drought and excessive rainfall are the nature of the monsoon system. Agricultural<br />
production, far from being decimated by worsening floods over the last twenty years, has<br />
nearly doubled,‖ Bradnock wrote on June 9, 2008. ―There remain many academics from a<br />
wide range of fields who question the evidence, and who believe that the catalogue of woes<br />
directly attributed to ‗global warming‘ cannot be reduced simply to an increase in the<br />
proportion of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from 280 parts per million by volume to<br />
c.384 ppmv - the increase that has taken place as a result of the intensive use of fossil fuels<br />
since the beginning of the industrial revolution,‖ Bradnock added. (LINK) (LINK)<br />
Chemical Engineer Dr. Thomas L. Gould, an award-winning engineer with the<br />
Society of Petroleum Engineers, dissented from climate fears in 2008. ―<strong>Global</strong> warming<br />
is dominated by the sun, clouds, water vapor, and other factors before any influence is felt<br />
by CO2,‖ Gould wrote EPW on June 10, 2008. ―Even if you accept the alarmist view that<br />
the seas will rise and this is a ‗Planetary Emergency‘, why do we think that we can solve<br />
this problem with climate control, costing $10‘s of Trillions? We need to change the<br />
debate, and not let the alarmists set the agenda,‖ Gould wrote. ―I have been doing a lot of<br />
personal research into the short comings of the <strong>Global</strong> Warming alarmist theories,‖ he<br />
added. (LINK)<br />
119