05.11.2014 Views

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

this conference is evidence that there are numerous respected, established and in many<br />

cases world-renowned scientists who have done careful research in various areas of<br />

‗climate change‘ that sharply differ with the [UN] IPCC results,‖ Goldenberg told the New<br />

York Times. (LINK) (LINK)<br />

Mechanical Engineer Dan Pangburn, a licensed engineer with master in Mechanical<br />

Engineering and author of a climate research paper, dissented in 2008. ―For most of<br />

earth‘s history carbon dioxide level has been several times higher than the present,‖<br />

Pangburn wrote in his paper on March 15, 2008. ―The conclusion from all this is that<br />

carbon dioxide change does NOT cause significant climate change. Actions to control the<br />

amount of non-condensing greenhouse gases that are added to the atmosphere are based on<br />

the mistaken assumption that global warming was caused by human activity,‖ he added.<br />

(LINK)<br />

Physicist and engineer Dr. Jeffrey A. Glassman, a former Division Chief Scientist for<br />

Hughes Aircraft Company, is an expert modeler of microwave and millimeter wave<br />

propagation in the atmosphere solar radiation, thermal energy in avionics. Glassman<br />

has conducted several studies on CO2 and climate including a July 6, 2007, paper titled,<br />

―Solar Wind has Twice the <strong>Global</strong> Warming Effect of El Niño.‖ Glassman is blunt, writing,<br />

―The consensus of climate mistakenly attributes solar wind warming to man-made carbon<br />

dioxide.‖ Glassman has researched ice core data and concluded, ―CO2 concentration is a<br />

response to the proxy temperature in the Vostok ice core data, not a cause. This does not<br />

contradict that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, but it does contradict the conjecture that the<br />

presence of a greenhouse gas has any destabilizing effect on global climate. Other forces<br />

overwhelm the conjecture of a runaway greenhouse effect. The concentration of CO2 is<br />

dynamic, controlled by the solubility pump. <strong>Global</strong> temperature is controlled first by the<br />

primary thermodynamic loop.‖ Glassman concluded, ―The Vostok data support an entirely<br />

new model. Atmospheric CO2 is absorbed by the oceans. Fires, volcanoes, and now man<br />

deposit CO2 into the atmosphere, but those effects are transient. What exists in steady state<br />

is CO2 perpetually pumped into the atmosphere by the oceans. Atmospheric CO2 is a<br />

dynamic stream, from the warm ocean and back into the cool ocean. Public policy<br />

represented by the Kyoto Accords and the efforts to reduce CO2 emissions should be<br />

scrapped as wasteful, unjustified, and futile.‖ (LINK)<br />

Chemical Engineer Bob Ashworth holds 16 U.S. patents on fuels and emission control<br />

techniques, has written 55 technical papers on fuel technologies, and is a member of<br />

the American Geophysical Union. Ashworth authored a 2008 technical analysis of<br />

global warming titled “No Evidence to Support Carbon Dioxide Causing <strong>Global</strong><br />

Warming!” ―Nature absorbs 98.5% of the CO2 that is emitted by nature and man. As<br />

CO2 increases in the atmosphere, nature's controlling mechanism causes plant growth to<br />

increase via photosynthesis; CO2 is absorbed, and oxygen is liberated,‖ Ashworth wrote on<br />

December 9, 2008. ―The lesson to the world here is, when it comes to science, never<br />

blindly accept an explanation from a politician or scientists who have turned political for<br />

their own private gain. Taxing carbon will have absolutely no beneficial effect on our<br />

climate, will hurt the economies of the world, and will be harmful to the production of food<br />

because less carbon dioxide means reduced plant growth,‖ Ashworth wrote. (LINK)<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!