Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

theoretical, that carbon dioxide emissions from industrial and other human activities can
have any effect on global climate,‖ Nicol explained. ―The fundamental requirement of
reproducible evidence has been lost in the process of promulgating the messages regarding
the output from the experimental computer models providing suggestions of global
warming for the IPCC reports. No two of these 23 models provide the same values of
temperature – the results are not reproducible,‖ Nicol added. ―That human-caused global
climate change is so small that it cannot yet be differentiated from natural changes has not
been accepted. Rather our governments are being subjected to calls to provide policies
based on unsubstantiated assertions of largely non-scientific executives of the IPCC, who
ignore the uncertainties expressed in the main scientific reports of the International
Panel. Evidence that no changes have been observed in Monsoonal activity, snow in the
Himalayas, the rate of glacial retreat and the rise of sea level is conveniently ignored or
presented as perceived evidence of ‗change,‘‖ he added. ―The best scientific advice
available at present is to ‗Follow the Sun.‘ Adaptation to climate change will not be aided
by imprudent restructuring of the world‘s energy economy in pursuit of the mitigation of an
alleged 9 C dangerous human-caused warming that can neither be demonstrated nor
measured,‖ Nicol concluded. (LINK)
Veteran Meteorologist William R. Young denounced the cause of climate change in
2008. ―As a meteorologist with 37 years of practical experience and a master's degree
in meteorology, I can tell you that is one of the stupidest comments I have ever heard,‖
Young wrote on October 4, 2008, after then Vice President nominee Senator Joe Biden
blamed mankind for global warming. ―We can all debate global warming and how much of
an impact it has had and will have on our future weather, but not all change is the result of
man. If he would question that, have him (Biden) give me a call,‖ Young added. (LINK)
Physics professor Wayne Hocking heads the Atmospheric Dynamics Group at the
University of Western Ontario, has an extensive list of scientific publications, coedited
of the 1990 book The Earth's Middle Atmosphere, and dissented in 2008.
Scientists ―do not know enough about the atmospheric changes‖ to ―draw any conclusions
about global warming,‖ Hocking, who presented his polar research to the Physics and
Astronomy Colloquium, said according to an October 9, 2008 article. The article reported,
―Hocking is hesitant to claim he can make any predictions about global warming. ‗For this
to be effective, we need to be there for 20, 30, 40 years, have a long-term data set and then
we can start to make useful predictions,‘‖ Hocking said. ―We know there is so much
complexity involved, we want to tread more cautiously,‖ he says. ―Maybe in 10 years time,
it‘ll all (the icecaps) start to freeze over, we just don‘t know,‖ he explained. The article
continued, ―Hocking cautions against focusing solely on global warming, but rather to view
it as one of many atmospheric changes that must be researched and understood. ‗I think it‘s
too narrow of a view,‘ he says. ‗You‘ve got to consider everything together and see global
warming as part of a larger picture rather than something in isolation.‘‖ ―I‘m not against
global warming, but I want people to realize it is only one of many dynamic events that
occur in the atmosphere and we need to understand them all,‖ he says. (LINK) (LINK)
Chemist Dr. Kenneth Rundt, a bio-molecule researcher and formerly a research
assistant and teacher at Abo Akademi University in Finland, declared his global
warming dissent in June 2008. ―Let me state immediately before you read on that I count
myself among the ‗skeptics‘,‖ Rundt wrote in a scientific paper titled ―Global Warming –
129