05.11.2014 Views

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

United Nations. It is not a scientific body; it is a political body,‖ he wrote. Drapela also<br />

noted that he is ―not a Republican; owns no stocks in oil companies (or any other<br />

companies); loves the outdoors and the environment; loves polar bears and clean air and<br />

water.‖ (LINK) (LINK) (LINK) (LINK)<br />

Geologist Allan Shepard, former Chief Geologist for Amoco <strong>International</strong> and<br />

member of the Association of Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta,<br />

dissented in 2009. ―I conclude that there has been both slight warming and cooling over the<br />

past hundred years or more largely driven by the sun and its interaction with clouds, winds,<br />

ocean currents etc. CO2's contribution to any warming is negligible,‖ Shepard wrote to the<br />

Environment and Public Works Committee on February 12, 2009. ―It took only a few<br />

months of research to find that I was skeptical for the reason that the IPCC was in my<br />

estimation a politicized monopolistic scientific body,‖ Shepard wrote.<br />

Dr. Jim Buckee, who holds a PhD in Astrophysics from Oxford University, lectured<br />

about climate change at the University of Aberdeen and was the former chief<br />

executive of the oil and gas firm Talisman. Buckee dissented in 2009 and predicted the<br />

Earth is entering a 20 year cooling period. "I think [climate skepticism] is the dominant<br />

view in professional science circles. I know lots of people in universities and so on and<br />

quite often they have to retire before they can say what they want because it's so frowned<br />

upon." Buckee said according to a February 11, 2009, article. "Any dissension is like a<br />

heresy. People are stamped on so they can't be heard. That has religious overtones." The<br />

article continued, ―In the lecture, Dr. Jim Buckee will put forward the idea that solar<br />

activity is responsible for changes to the climate. He will say the climate of the past few<br />

hundred years is a continuation of a normal process of gradual warming since the ice age<br />

10,000 years ago. During that time, he argues, there have been constant fluctuations. He<br />

believes those fluctuations are caused by varying solar activity. When the sun is strong, it<br />

deflects cosmic rays from within and outside our galaxy. When the sun is weak, the rays<br />

enter the Earth's atmosphere and cause low cloud, which has a cooling effect. He believes<br />

that, after a period of warming, the Earth is now entering a period of cooling that will last<br />

until 2030 or beyond. It is just one of the many theories put forward by sceptics, who argue<br />

that humans are not responsible for climate change.‖ (LINK)<br />

Professor Dr. Doug L. Hoffman, mathematician, computer programmer, and<br />

engineer, worked on environmental models and conducted research in molecular<br />

dynamics simulations and continues to teach at Hendrix College and the University of<br />

Central Arkansas. Hoffman co-authored the 2009 book, The Resilient Earth,<br />

described as “bringing a dose of skeptical reality to climate science and the global<br />

warming debate.” Hoffman chastised the climate science community in 2009. ―Once<br />

again we have misleading climate change pronouncements being based on data errors, data<br />

errors detected by non-UN, non-IPCC, non-peer-reviewed external observers. Sometimes it<br />

is the scientists themselves who discover the errors, as with the non-disappearing ice sheets<br />

of Greenland,‖ Hoffman wrote on February 19, 2009. ―More often than not, it is outside<br />

observers uncovering the errors, casting doubt on the trustworthiness of all science. This is<br />

exactly what happens when you base your arguments on ‗consensus science‘ and not<br />

scientific fact. What is happening to the Arctic ice this year? So far, the sea ice extent is<br />

tracking ahead of 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008, so the predictions of an ice-free north pole<br />

might be a bit premature,‖ Hoffman explained. (LINK) (LINK) (LINK) (LINK)<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!