23.11.2014 Views

Global Study On Child Poverty And Disparities (PDF) - Social Policy ...

Global Study On Child Poverty And Disparities (PDF) - Social Policy ...

Global Study On Child Poverty And Disparities (PDF) - Social Policy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Each of these factors potentially affecting poverty<br />

is discussed below.<br />

Gender: The gender of household members<br />

does not appear to be contributing significantly to<br />

household poverty, with on average 13.0 per cent<br />

of males and 13.3 per cent of females living in<br />

poverty. The poverty gap for males and females is<br />

also close to identical (4.6 per cent of the poverty<br />

line and 4.7 per cent, respectively). However, this<br />

reflects the fact that poverty is measured at the<br />

household level, given the nature of the data, and<br />

any differential use of goods and services within<br />

each household is not observed.<br />

Regarding the gender of the head of the<br />

household, both poverty rates and poverty gaps<br />

are higher for male-headed households than for<br />

female-headed households. In part, this may<br />

reflect the relatively small number and sample<br />

size of female-headed households in Vanuatu.<br />

Age: Households containing teenagers and those<br />

containing people over 65 years of age tend to<br />

have the highest poverty rates, while those with<br />

members of prime working age (25 to 44 years)<br />

have the lowest poverty rates. The poverty gap<br />

is highest for those over 65 years of age. For the<br />

same reason, households containing a person<br />

over 70 years of age have higher poverty rates<br />

than those with only younger members.<br />

Household size and dependency: The number<br />

of people in the household is highly correlated<br />

with poverty and also with larger poverty gaps.<br />

Very small households (with fewer than three<br />

members) appear not to be poor at all, although<br />

this probably reflects small sample sizes.<br />

Households with seven or more members have<br />

poverty rates that are nearly twice as high as the<br />

overall average, and the poverty gap is also much<br />

larger for these households. Households with high<br />

dependency ratios – that is, four or more children<br />

for each adult – have poverty rates that are twice<br />

as high as those of all households with children;<br />

however, the poverty gap for these households is<br />

no higher than the overall average.<br />

Education level of head of household:<br />

Education appears to be strongly correlated with<br />

poverty risks. Nineteen per cent of households<br />

where the head has no schooling are in poverty,<br />

compared to 5 per cent of those whose head<br />

finished secondary school. The poverty gap is<br />

also four times as high for those with no schooling<br />

as for those with high school.<br />

Ethnicity: Ni-Vanuatu have higher than<br />

overall poverty rates; but due to the very small<br />

representation of other ethnic groups in the<br />

population (and therefore in the HIES sample),<br />

there are no reliable Figures for other ethnic<br />

groups.<br />

Province: Provincial disparities shown in Table<br />

2.2 are broadly similar to the results discussed<br />

in previous sections, except that the results refer<br />

to households with children and not children<br />

themselves. Using the national level poverty line,<br />

child poverty rates are highest in Torba and Tafea.<br />

<strong>Poverty</strong> gaps are significantly wider in Torba,<br />

however – more than twice the overall average.<br />

This means that not only are there proportionally<br />

more poor households with children in Torba, but<br />

that they are further below the poverty line than in<br />

other parts of the country.<br />

<strong>Poverty</strong> risks<br />

Table 2.3 compares the likelihood of experiencing<br />

poverty of an individual or household with specific<br />

characteristics, compared to that of an individual<br />

or household without those characteristics. For<br />

example, among households with children, for<br />

those with a male in the household the poverty<br />

rate is 99 per cent of that for those with no males<br />

in the household. Households with a male under<br />

14 years have a poverty rate that is 112 per cent<br />

of those with no male children of this age.<br />

These values are expressed as ‘odds ratios’: a<br />

ratio of less than 1.0 means that this characteristic<br />

could be regarded as a protective factor, reducing<br />

poverty risks, and a ratio of over 1.0 means that<br />

the characteristic increases poverty risks. The<br />

Table shows these risks both for households with<br />

children and for all households (with and without<br />

children).<br />

For households with children, risks of poverty are<br />

heightened if there are older children (age 15 to<br />

25 years) in the household, and if there are people<br />

45 years and over in the household. <strong>Poverty</strong> risks<br />

are much lower for small households, but greatly<br />

increased for households with seven or more<br />

people or with a high dependency ratio. As noted<br />

previously, education is an important factor – the<br />

presence of someone with secondary education is<br />

the strongest protective factor, even stronger than<br />

small household size. The strongest risk factor<br />

is large household size, which is considerably<br />

stronger than low levels of education. Among<br />

all households, the absence of women is also a<br />

strong risk factor.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!