21.12.2014 Views

Electromagnetic Testing - Eddy Current Testing Applications Chapter 5 & 6

Eddy Current Chapter 5 and 6

Eddy Current Chapter 5 and 6

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Higher frequencies than 2.2f 90 may give greater accuracy, but the signal from a<br />

shallow flaw at the outside surface will then approach the horizontal (180 °) and<br />

so could be confused with a dent indication or probe wobble signals. Also,<br />

higher frequencies reduce the strength of signals from flaws at the outside<br />

surface. It should be noted that operating at 2f 90 rotates signals from conducting<br />

non-ferromagnetic deposits at the outside surface to over 360° – that is, to the<br />

region occupied by flaws at the inside surface. Care must be taken therefore to<br />

correctly identify signals from such deposits at the frequency used for detection<br />

of signals (f 90 ) before changing to the evaluation frequency. The accuracy of<br />

flaw depth estimation increases with increasing flaw depth. This is<br />

advantageous because the greater flaw depths are of course more critical.<br />

Charlie Chong/ Fion Zhang

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!