21.12.2014 Views

Electromagnetic Testing - Eddy Current Testing Applications Chapter 5 & 6

Eddy Current Chapter 5 and 6

Eddy Current Chapter 5 and 6

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Permeability variations in ferromagnetic material are quite common because of<br />

small variations in composition, heat treatment, amount of cold work, and<br />

residual stress, for example from straightening the bar, and, if the material has<br />

been magnetized, because of different degrees of magnetization. This leads to a<br />

noisy signal. These two limitations, the inability to measure bar diameter and<br />

noisy signals, and a third limitation, the very restricted depth of penetration<br />

because of the high permeability, can be overcome by magnetizing the material<br />

to or close to saturation. In this condition, the material has an incremental<br />

permeability of, or close to, one, and therefore shows the same behaviour to<br />

eddy current testing as non-ferromagnetic material. In this case, the analysis<br />

used for non-ferromagnetic bars applies. Ferromagnetic bars and tubes are<br />

therefore often tested with two large coils carrying a large direct current, one<br />

either side of the eddy current coil(s). The current required is usually large<br />

enough to cause heating problems in the magnetizing coils, and pulsing the<br />

current and the use of water cooled jackets are often employed to overcome<br />

these problems.<br />

Charlie Chong/ Fion Zhang

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!