01.01.2015 Views

Jupiter Annual Report 2010 - Jupiter Asset Management

Jupiter Annual Report 2010 - Jupiter Asset Management

Jupiter Annual Report 2010 - Jupiter Asset Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Business review | Directors’ report<br />

Net revenue<br />

Figure 7<br />

Underlying fixed costs up 6%<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

£m<br />

2009<br />

£m<br />

Net management fees 204.7 158.4<br />

Net initial charge 20.1 18.5<br />

Net performance fees 5.7 5.2<br />

TOTAL 230.5 182.1<br />

Figure 6<br />

Net management fees up 29%<br />

2009<br />

£m<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

158.4<br />

204.7<br />

Net revenue for the period was £230.5m (2009: £182.1m), 27 per<br />

cent. ahead of 2009. This was mainly due to an increase of 29 per<br />

cent. in net management fees, reflecting 20 per cent. higher average<br />

FTSE 100 levels at 5,465 (2009: 4,541) and the contribution from net<br />

inflows over the last two years. The net management fee margin for<br />

the year was 98 basis points, slightly above the full year 2009 margin.<br />

This was due to the increased proportion of mutual funds as a<br />

percentage of average AUM (76 per cent. versus 74 per cent.<br />

in 2009), as these assets typically tend to have a higher margin.<br />

However, we expect net management fee margins to decline slowly<br />

over time, as distributors take an increasing share of fees and the<br />

Retail Distribution Review alters industry pricing structures, although<br />

the rate and angle of decline is uncertain.<br />

Net management fee margin <strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

Average FTSE 5,465 4,541<br />

Average AUM £bn 21.1 16.3<br />

Net management fee margin bps 98 97<br />

Net initial charges and commissions increased by £1.6m to<br />

£20.1m (2009: £18.5m), reflecting higher levels of gross sales and<br />

redemptions versus 2009, driving higher box profits. Performance<br />

fees of £5.7m (2009: £5.2m) are in line with the previous year.<br />

Approximately £3.2bn of our AUM attracts a performance fee,<br />

the majority of which has a calculation period ending in the second<br />

half of the financial year.<br />

2009<br />

£m<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Fixed staff costs<br />

Non-staff costs<br />

38.4<br />

39.1<br />

Figure 8<br />

Variable staff costs increased while the<br />

variable compensation ratio remained stable<br />

32.5<br />

30.5 68.9<br />

33.7 72.8<br />

Administrative expenses<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

£m<br />

2009<br />

£m<br />

Fixed staff costs 39.1 38.4<br />

Other expenses 35.7 28.1<br />

Total fixed costs 74.8 66.5<br />

Variable staff costs 32.5 25.8<br />

Charge for options over<br />

pre-Listing shares<br />

7.8 –<br />

Administrative expenses 115.1 92.3<br />

Figure 9<br />

EBITDA up 37%<br />

2009<br />

£m<br />

2009<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

25.8<br />

Variable staff costs (£m)<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

21.0 21.0<br />

Compensation ratio (per cent.)<br />

91.2<br />

124.6<br />

Administrative expenses of £115.1m were £22.8m higher than 2009<br />

as a result of increased variable compensation costs arising from<br />

improved profitability in <strong>2010</strong> and charges for options over pre-Listing<br />

shares. Fixed staff costs of £39.1m remained stable (2009: £38.4m),<br />

with headcount reduced by 75 in August as a result of the outsourcing<br />

of UTA operations to IFDS. This has improved operational scalability<br />

within the business and moved our fixed cost base to being more<br />

aligned with our activity levels. Occupancy costs were increased<br />

by £2.0m for a provision for the closure of our West Malling office<br />

after the UTA outsource in <strong>2010</strong> but were also reduced in 2009<br />

by a non-recurring lease provision release of £2.4m which relates<br />

to 4 Grosvenor Place. Excluding these two items, underlying fixed<br />

costs of £72.8m (2009: £68.9m) were 6 per cent. up on the prior year.<br />

Variable staff costs increased in line with the higher profitability<br />

of the business in <strong>2010</strong>. Variable compensation as a proportion<br />

of pre-variable compensation operating earnings was 21 per cent.<br />

(2009: 21 per cent.). This excludes a £7.8m charge for <strong>2010</strong> in<br />

respect of options granted prior to the Listing over the remaining<br />

shares in the pool established for employees at the time of the MBO<br />

in June 2007. We expect the variable compensation ratio outlined<br />

above to rise to the high twenty per cents over the medium-term<br />

as the incentive schemes put in place as part of our Listing build<br />

to maturity.<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> & Accounts <strong>2010</strong> 21 <strong>Jupiter</strong> Fund <strong>Management</strong> plc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!