01.01.2015 Views

Jupiter Annual Report 2010 - Jupiter Asset Management

Jupiter Annual Report 2010 - Jupiter Asset Management

Jupiter Annual Report 2010 - Jupiter Asset Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Business review | Directors’ report<br />

Other gains/losses<br />

Other gains were £1.7m, arising from a £1.0m one-off gain on the<br />

part disposal of our stake in Cofunds and a small net increase in<br />

the market value of our seed capital investments. This is £0.7m lower<br />

than the £2.4m in 2009.<br />

Amortisation of intangible assets<br />

Amortisation of £39.8m (2009: £39.8m) included £38.7m (2009:<br />

£38.7m) relating to intangible assets acquired as part of the MBO<br />

on 19 June 2007. These assets relate to the acquired investment<br />

management contracts and the <strong>Jupiter</strong> brand name, and are amortised<br />

on a straight line basis over seven and ten years respectively.<br />

Exceptional costs<br />

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme announced<br />

on 20 January 2011 that a second interim levy for <strong>2010</strong>/11 would be<br />

imposed on the industry for the costs of major investment failures<br />

such as Keydata Investment Services Limited. The cost to the Group<br />

is £5.2m and the full amount has been recognised in <strong>2010</strong>. This<br />

charge did not arise from any action taken or omission by the Group.<br />

The Group also recognised an exceptional cost for the year of £1.6m<br />

(2009: £nil) which relates to expenses associated with the Listing.<br />

Of the overall cost of Listing of £15.7m, £10.3m relating to the issue<br />

of new equity was written off against the share premium account and<br />

£3.8m of loan amendment fees are included within finance expense<br />

in the income statement.<br />

Finance expense<br />

Finance expenses decreased by £17.4m to £29.0m (2009: £46.4m).<br />

This includes £12.5m of non-recurring expenses relating to the MBO<br />

capital structure and £3.8m of expenses incurred to modify the terms<br />

of the bank loan in order to facilitate the Listing. After our Listing,<br />

finance costs have only been incurred on our £283.0m bank loan.<br />

Interest on this is paid at a margin of 3.75 per cent. over 3 month<br />

LIBOR, although the Group fixed its interest rate on £70m of the<br />

debt via swaps over three and four year periods with effect from<br />

1 November <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Figure 10<br />

Finance expense reduced due to balance sheet restructuring<br />

2009<br />

£m<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

29.0<br />

Figure 11<br />

Underlying EPS increased in line with increased profitability<br />

46.4<br />

Profit before tax<br />

PBT for the year was £42.4m (2009: £7.2m). This increase was driven<br />

by increased operating earnings and a reduction in finance expenses<br />

in the second half of the year.<br />

Tax expense<br />

The effective tax charge for <strong>2010</strong> is 23 per cent. (2009: tax credit 19 per<br />

cent.). The effective tax rate for <strong>2010</strong> is lower than the standard rate<br />

of corporation tax of 28 per cent. due to the utilisation of brought<br />

forward capital losses on gains made on disposal of investments during<br />

the year and the effect of restating closing deferred tax balances in light<br />

of the forthcoming changes to the standard rate of corporation tax. The<br />

impact of these on the effective tax rate was magnified by PBT being<br />

a relatively low number in <strong>2010</strong> due to the pre-Listing finance charges.<br />

EPS<br />

Profit before tax<br />

for the year<br />

(2009: £7.2m)<br />

£<br />

42.4m<br />

In <strong>2010</strong> the Group’s basic and diluted EPS measures were 10.8p and<br />

7.6p respectively. Comparisons with the prior period are not meaningful<br />

because of the different capital structures and the Listing consequences.<br />

The Board has also developed an underlying earnings per share<br />

measure which it believes provides a more useful representation of<br />

the Group’s trading performance as the statutory EPS measures are<br />

affected by various accounting treatments, including the Listing, the<br />

unwinding of the MBO capital structure and management’s share<br />

vesting and lock-in agreements.<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

2009<br />

Underlying EPS*<br />

£m<br />

£m<br />

Profit before tax 42.4 7.2<br />

Adjustments:<br />

Amortisation of acquired intangibles 38.7 38.7<br />

Charge for options over pre-Listing shares 7.8 –<br />

Exceptional Listing cost 1.6 –<br />

FSCS levy exceptional cost 5.2 –<br />

Pre-Listing loan amendment fees 3.8 –<br />

Finance expense relating to pre-Listing<br />

capital structure<br />

12.5 26.8<br />

Underlying profit before tax 112.0 72.7<br />

Tax effect @ statutory rate 28% (31.4) (20.4)<br />

Underlying profit after tax 80.6 52.3<br />

2009<br />

11.4p<br />

Actual shares on post vesting basis/m 457.7 457.7<br />

Underlying EPS 17.6p 11.4p<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

17.6p<br />

*Underlying EPS is a non-GAAP measure which the Group uses to assess<br />

its performance.<br />

The <strong>2010</strong> underlying EPS was 17.6p (2009: 11.4p). This increase<br />

is the result of the improved trading performance of the Group.<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> & Accounts <strong>2010</strong> 22 <strong>Jupiter</strong> Fund <strong>Management</strong> plc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!