23.07.2012 Views

Linear Algebra

Linear Algebra

Linear Algebra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section I. Definition of Vector Space 93<br />

2.6 Example All kinds of vector spaces, not just R n ’s, have subspaces. The<br />

vector space of cubic polynomials {a + bx + cx 2 + dx 3 � � a, b, c, d ∈ R} has a subspace<br />

comprised of all linear polynomials {m + nx � � m, n ∈ R}.<br />

2.7 Example Another example of a subspace not taken from an R n is one<br />

from the examples following the definition of a vector space. The space of all<br />

real-valued functions of one real variable f : R → R has a subspace of functions<br />

satisfying the restriction (d 2 f/dx 2 )+f =0.<br />

2.8 Example Being vector spaces themselves, subspaces must satisfy the closure<br />

conditions. The set R + is not a subspace of the vector space R 1 because<br />

with the inherited operations it is not closed under scalar multiplication: if<br />

�v = 1 then −1 · �v �∈ R + .<br />

The next result says that Example 2.8 is prototypical. The only way that a<br />

subset can fail to be a subspace (if it is nonempty and the inherited operations<br />

are used) is if it isn’t closed.<br />

2.9 Lemma For a nonempty subset S of a vector space, under the inherited<br />

operations, the following are equivalent statements. ∗<br />

(1) S is a subspace of that vector space<br />

(2) S is closed under linear combinations of pairs of vectors: for any vectors<br />

�s1,�s2 ∈ S and scalars r1,r2 the vector r1�s1 + r2�s2 is in S<br />

(3) S is closed under linear combinations of any number of vectors: for any<br />

vectors �s1,... ,�sn ∈ S and scalars r1,... ,rn the vector r1�s1 + ···+ rn�sn is<br />

in S.<br />

Briefly, the way that a subset gets to be a subspace is by being closed under<br />

linear combinations.<br />

Proof. ‘The following are equivalent’ means that each pair of statements are<br />

equivalent.<br />

(1) ⇐⇒ (2) (2) ⇐⇒ (3) (3) ⇐⇒ (1)<br />

We will show this equivalence by establishing that (1) =⇒ (3) =⇒ (2) =⇒<br />

(1). This strategy is suggested by noticing that (1) =⇒ (3) and (3) =⇒ (2)<br />

are easy and so we need only argue the single implication (2) =⇒ (1).<br />

For that argument, assume that S is a nonempty subset of a vector space V<br />

and that S is closed under combinations of pairs of vectors. We will show that<br />

S is a vector space by checking the conditions.<br />

The first item in the vector space definition has five conditions. First, for<br />

closure under addition, if �s1,�s2 ∈ S then �s1 + �s2 ∈ S, as�s1 + �s2 =1· �s1 +1· �s2.<br />

Second, for any �s1,�s2 ∈ S, because addition is inherited from V , the sum �s1 +�s2<br />

in S equals the sum �s1 +�s2 in V , and that equals the sum �s2 +�s1 in V (because<br />

V is a vector space, its addition is commutative), and that in turn equals the<br />

sum �s2 +�s1 in S. The argument for the third condition is similar to that for the<br />

∗ More information on equivalence of statements is in the appendix.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!