23.07.2012 Views

Linear Algebra

Linear Algebra

Linear Algebra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

260 Chapter 3. Maps Between Spaces<br />

(d) Prove that �v =proj [�κ1](�v )+···+proj [�κk](�v ).<br />

2.18 Bessel’s Inequality. Consider these orthonormal sets<br />

B1 = {�e1} B2 = {�e1,�e2} B3 = {�e1,�e2,�e3} B4 = {�e1,�e2,�e3,�e4}<br />

along with the vector �v ∈ R 4 whose components are 4, 3, 2, and 1.<br />

(a) Find the coefficient c1 for the projection of �v into the span of the vector in<br />

B1. Checkthat��v � 2 ≥|c1| 2 .<br />

(b) Find the coefficients c1 and c2 for the projection of �v into the spans of the<br />

two vectors in B2. Checkthat��v � 2 ≥|c1| 2 + |c2| 2 .<br />

(c) Find c1, c2, andc3 associated with the vectors in B3, andc1, c2, c3, andc4<br />

for the vectors in B4. Check that ��v � 2 ≥|c1| 2 + ···+ |c3| 2 and that ��v � 2 ≥<br />

|c1| 2 + ···+ |c4| 2 .<br />

Show that this holds in general: where {�κ1,... ,�κk} is an orthonormal set and ci is<br />

coefficient of the projection of a vector �v from the space then ��v � 2 ≥|c1| 2 + ···+<br />

|ck| 2 . Hint. One way is to look at the inequality 0 ≤��v − (c1�κ1 + ···+ ck�κk)� 2<br />

and expand the c’s.<br />

2.19 Prove or disprove: every vector in R n is in some orthogonal basis.<br />

2.20 Show that the columns of an n×n matrix form an orthonormal set if and only<br />

if the inverse of the matrix is its transpose. Produce such a matrix.<br />

2.21 Does the proof of Theorem 2.2 fail to consider the possibility that the set of<br />

vectors is empty (i.e., that k =0)?<br />

2.22 Theorem 2.7 describes a change of basis from any basis B = 〈 � β1,... , � βk〉 to<br />

one that is orthogonal K = 〈�κ1,... ,�κk〉. Consider the change of basis matrix<br />

Rep B,K(id).<br />

(a) Prove that the matrix Rep K,B(id) changing bases in the direction opposite<br />

to that of the theorem has an upper triangular shape—all of its entries below<br />

the main diagonal are zeros.<br />

(b) Prove that the inverse of an upper triangular matrix is also upper triangular<br />

(if the matrix is invertible, that is). This shows that the matrix Rep B,K(id)<br />

changing bases in the direction described in the theorem is upper triangular.<br />

2.23 Complete the induction argument in the proof of Theorem 2.7.<br />

3.VI.3 Projection Into a Subspace<br />

This subsection, like the others in this section, is optional. It also requires<br />

material from the optional earlier subsection on Direct Sums.<br />

The prior subsections project a vector into a line by decomposing it into two<br />

parts: the part in the line proj [�s ](�v ) and the rest �v − proj [�s ](�v ). To generalize<br />

projection to arbitrary subspaces, we follow this idea.<br />

3.1 Definition For any direct sum V = M ⊕ N and any �v ∈ V ,theprojection<br />

of �v into M along N is<br />

where �v = �m + �n with �m ∈ M, �n ∈ N.<br />

proj M,N(�v )=�m

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!