23.07.2012 Views

Linear Algebra

Linear Algebra

Linear Algebra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54 Chapter 1. <strong>Linear</strong> Systems<br />

x1 has been removed from x5’s equation. That is, Gauss’ method has made x5’s<br />

row independent of x1’s row.<br />

Independence of a collection of row vectors, or of any kind of vectors, will<br />

be precisely defined and explored in the next chapter. But a first take on it is<br />

that we can show that, say, the third row above is not comprised of the other<br />

rows, that ρ3 �= c1ρ1 + c2ρ2 + c4ρ4. For, suppose that there are scalars c1, c2,<br />

and c4 such that this relationship holds.<br />

�<br />

0 0 0 3 3<br />

� �<br />

0 = c1 2 3 7 8 0<br />

�<br />

0<br />

� �<br />

+ c2 0 0 1 5 1 1<br />

� �<br />

+ c4 0 0 0 0 2 1<br />

The first row’s leading entry is in the first column and narrowing our consideration<br />

of the above relationship to consideration only of the entries from the first<br />

column 0 = 2c1+0c2+0c4 gives that c1 = 0. The second row’s leading entry is in<br />

the third column and the equation of entries in that column 0 = 7c1 +1c2 +0c4,<br />

along with the knowledge that c1 = 0, gives that c2 = 0. Now, to finish, the<br />

third row’s leading entry is in the fourth column and the equation of entries<br />

in that column 3 = 8c1 +5c2 +0c4, along with c1 =0andc2 = 0, gives an<br />

impossibility.<br />

The following result shows that this effect always holds. It shows that what<br />

Gauss’ linear elimination method eliminates is linear relationships among the<br />

rows.<br />

2.5 Lemma In an echelon form matrix, no nonzero row is a linear combination<br />

of the other rows.<br />

Proof. Let R be in echelon form. Suppose, to obtain a contradiction, that<br />

some nonzero row is a linear combination of the others.<br />

ρi = c1ρ1 + ...+ ci−1ρi−1 + ci+1ρi+1 + ...+ cmρm<br />

We will first use induction to show that the coefficients c1, ... , ci−1 associated<br />

with rows above ρi are all zero. The contradiction will come from consideration<br />

of ρi and the rows below it.<br />

The base step of the induction argument is to show that the first coefficient<br />

c1 is zero. Let the first row’s leading entry be in column number ℓ1 be the<br />

column number of the leading entry of the first row and consider the equation<br />

of entries in that column.<br />

ρi,ℓ1<br />

= c1ρ1,ℓ1 + ...+ ci−1ρi−1,ℓ1 + ci+1ρi+1,ℓ1 + ...+ cmρm,ℓ1<br />

The matrix is in echelon form so the entries ρ2,ℓ1 , ... , ρm,ℓ1 , including ρi,ℓ1 ,are<br />

all zero.<br />

0=c1ρ1,ℓ1 + ···+ ci−1 · 0+ci+1 · 0+···+ cm · 0<br />

Because the entry ρ1,ℓ1 is nonzero as it leads its row, the coefficient c1 must be<br />

zero.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!