23.07.2012 Views

Linear Algebra

Linear Algebra

Linear Algebra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section III. Nilpotence 377<br />

�<br />

−2<br />

(a)<br />

−1<br />

�<br />

45<br />

�<br />

4<br />

2<br />

−22<br />

�<br />

3<br />

(b)<br />

1<br />

�<br />

−19<br />

�<br />

1<br />

3<br />

(c)<br />

�<br />

−3<br />

−3<br />

−3<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

�<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

(e) 33 −16 −14<br />

69 −34 −29<br />

� 2.20 Find the canonical form of<br />

⎛<br />

this matrix.<br />

0 1 1 0<br />

⎞<br />

1<br />

⎜0<br />

⎜<br />

⎜0<br />

⎝0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1 ⎟<br />

0⎟<br />

0⎠<br />

0 0 0 0 0<br />

(d)<br />

�<br />

1 1<br />

�<br />

4<br />

3 0 −1<br />

5 2 7<br />

� 2.21 Consider the matrix from Example 2.16.<br />

(a) Use the action of the map on the string basis to give the canonical form.<br />

(b) Find the change of basis matrices that bring the matrix to canonical form.<br />

(c) Use the answer in the prior item to check the answer in the first item.<br />

� 2.22 Each of these matrices is nilpotent.<br />

� �<br />

1/2 −1/2<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

1/2 −1/2<br />

� 0 0 0<br />

0 −1 1<br />

0 −1 1<br />

�<br />

(c)<br />

�<br />

−1 1<br />

�<br />

−1<br />

1 0 1<br />

1 −1 1<br />

Put each in canonical form.<br />

2.23 Describe the effect of left or right multiplication by a matrix that is in the<br />

canonical form for nilpotent matrices.<br />

2.24 Is nilpotence invariant under similarity? That is, must a matrix similar to a<br />

nilpotent matrix also be nilpotent? If so, with the same index?<br />

� 2.25 Show that the only eigenvalue of a nilpotent matrix is zero.<br />

2.26 Is there a nilpotent transformation of index three on a two-dimensional space?<br />

2.27 In the proof of Theorem 2.13, why isn’t the proof’s base case that the index<br />

of nilpotency is zero?<br />

� 2.28 Let t: V → V be a linear transformation and suppose �v ∈ V is such that<br />

t k (�v) =�0 but t k−1 (�v) �= �0. Consider the t-string 〈�v, t(�v),...,t k−1 (�v)〉.<br />

(a) Prove that t is a transformation on the span of the set of vectors in the string,<br />

that is, prove that t restricted to the span has a range that is a subset of the<br />

span. We say that the span is a t-invariant subspace.<br />

(b) Prove that the restriction is nilpotent.<br />

(c) Prove that the t-string is linearly independent and so is a basis for its span.<br />

(d) Represent the restriction map with respect to the t-string basis.<br />

2.29 Finish the proof of Theorem 2.13.<br />

2.30 Show that the terms ‘nilpotent transformation’ and ‘nilpotent matrix’, as<br />

given in Definition 2.6, fit with each other: a map is nilpotent if and only if it is<br />

represented by a nilpotent matrix. (Is it that a transformation is nilpotent if an<br />

only if there is a basis such that the map’s representation with respect to that<br />

basis is a nilpotent matrix, or that any representation is a nilpotent matrix?)<br />

2.31 Let T be nilpotent of index four. How big can the rangespace of T 3 be?<br />

2.32 Recall that similar matrices have the same eigenvalues. Show that the converse<br />

does not hold.<br />

2.33 Prove a nilpotent matrix is similar to one that is all zeros except for blocks of<br />

super-diagonal ones.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!