23.07.2012 Views

Linear Algebra

Linear Algebra

Linear Algebra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section I. Definition 295<br />

determines singularity will involve applying Gauss’ method to the matrix, to<br />

show that in the end the product down the diagonal is zero if and only if the<br />

determinant formula gives zero. This suggests our initial plan: we will look for<br />

a family of functions with the property of being unaffected by row operations<br />

and with the property that a determinant of an echelon form matrix is the<br />

product of its diagonal entries. Under this plan, a proof that the functions<br />

determine singularity would go, “Where T →···→ ˆ T is the Gaussian reduction,<br />

the determinant of T equals the determinant of ˆ T (because the determinant is<br />

unchanged by row operations), which is the product down the diagonal, which<br />

is zero if and only if the matrix is singular”. In the rest of this subsection we<br />

will test this plan on the 2×2 and 3×3 determinants that we know. We will end<br />

up modifying the “unaffected by row operations” part, but not by much.<br />

The first step in checking the plan is to test whether the 2 × 2 and 3 × 3<br />

formulas are unaffected by the row operation of pivoting: if<br />

T kρi+ρj<br />

−→ ˆ T<br />

then is det( ˆ T ) = det(T )? This check of the 2×2 determinant after the kρ1 + ρ2<br />

operation<br />

�<br />

a<br />

det(<br />

ka + c<br />

�<br />

b<br />

)=a(kb + d) − (ka + c)b = ad − bc<br />

kb+ d<br />

shows that it is indeed unchanged, and the other 2×2 pivot kρ2 + ρ1 gives the<br />

same result. The 3×3 pivot kρ3 + ρ2 leaves the determinant unchanged<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

a b c<br />

det( ⎝kg<br />

+ d kh+ e ki+ f⎠)<br />

=a(kh + e)i + b(ki + f)g + c(kg + d)h<br />

g h i − h(ki + f)a − i(kg + d)b − g(kh + e)c<br />

= aei + bfg + cdh − hfa − idb − gec<br />

as do the other 3×3 pivot operations.<br />

So there seems to be promise in the plan. Of course, perhaps the 4 × 4<br />

determinant formula is affected by pivoting. We are exploring a possibility here<br />

and we do not yet have all the facts. Nonetheless, so far, so good.<br />

The next step is to compare det( ˆ T ) with det(T ) for the operation<br />

T ρi↔ρj<br />

−→ ˆ T<br />

of swapping two rows. The 2×2 rowswapρ1↔ρ2 � �<br />

c d<br />

det( )=cb − ad<br />

a b<br />

does not yield ad − bc. This ρ1 ↔ ρ3 swap inside of a 3×3 matrix<br />

⎛ ⎞<br />

g h i<br />

det( ⎝d e f⎠)<br />

=gec + hfa + idb − bfg − cdh − aei<br />

a b c

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!