17.01.2015 Views

LibraryPirate

LibraryPirate

LibraryPirate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

642 CHAPTER 12 THE CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION AND THE ANALYSIS OF FREQUENCIES<br />

aware of another variable that may be associated with the disease, with the risk factor,<br />

or with both in such a way that the true relationship between the disease status and the<br />

risk factor is masked. Such a variable is called a confounding variable. For example,<br />

experience might indicate the possibility that the relationship between some disease and<br />

a suspected risk factor differs among different ethnic groups. We would then treat ethnic<br />

membership as a confounding variable. When they can be identified, it is desirable<br />

to control for confounding variables so that an unambiguous measure of the relationship<br />

between disease status and risk factor may be calculated. A technique for accomplishing<br />

this objective is the Mantel–Haenszel (22) procedure, so called in recognition<br />

of the two men who developed it. The procedure allows us to test the null hypothesis<br />

that there is no association between status with respect to disease and risk factor status.<br />

Initially used only with data from retrospective studies, the Mantel–Haenszel procedure<br />

is also appropriate for use with data from prospective studies, as discussed by<br />

Mantel (23).<br />

In the application of the Mantel–Haenszel procedure, case and control subjects are<br />

assigned to strata corresponding to different values of the confounding variable. The data<br />

are then analyzed within individual strata as well as across all strata. The discussion that<br />

follows assumes that the data under analysis are from a retrospective or a prospective<br />

study with case and noncase subjects classified according to whether they have or do not<br />

have the suspected risk factor. The confounding variable is categorical, with the different<br />

categories defining the strata. If the confounding variable is continuous it must be categorized.<br />

For example, if the suspected confounding variable is age, we might group<br />

subjects into mutually exclusive age categories. The data before stratification may be<br />

displayed as shown in Table 12.7.3.<br />

Application of the Mantel–Haenszel procedure consists of the following steps.<br />

1. Form k strata corresponding to the k categories of the confounding variable. Table<br />

12.7.5 shows the data display for the ith stratum.<br />

2. For each stratum compute the expected frequency e i of the upper left-hand cell of<br />

Table 12.7.5 as follows:<br />

e i = 1a i + b i 21a i + c i 2<br />

n i<br />

(12.7.5)<br />

TABLE 12.7.5 Subjects in the ith Stratum of a Confounding<br />

Variable Classified According to Status Relative to a Risk<br />

Factor and Whether They Are Cases or Controls<br />

Sample<br />

Risk Factor Cases Controls Total<br />

Present<br />

Absent<br />

a i<br />

c i<br />

b i<br />

d i<br />

a i + b i<br />

c i + d i<br />

Total<br />

a i + c i<br />

b i + d i<br />

n i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!