17.01.2015 Views

LibraryPirate

LibraryPirate

LibraryPirate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84 CHAPTER 3 SOME BASIC PROBABILITY CONCEPTS<br />

confirmed that 43 of the 71 cases were bucket-handle tears. The cases may be cross-classified by<br />

“bow-tie sign” status and surgical results as follows:<br />

Tear Surgically Tear Surgically Confirmed As<br />

Confirmed (D) Not Present ( D) Total<br />

Positive Test 38 10 48<br />

(absent bow-tie sign) 1T2<br />

Negative Test 5 18 23<br />

(bow-tie sign present) 1T2<br />

Total 43 28 71<br />

Source: Theodore A. Dorsay and Clyde A. Helms, “Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears of the Knee: Sensitivity<br />

and Specificity of MRI Signs,” Skeletal Radiology, 32 (2003), 266–272.<br />

(a) What is the sensitivity of testing to see if the absent bow-tie sign indicates a meniscal tear<br />

(b) What is the specificity of testing to see if the absent bow-tie sign indicates a meniscal tear<br />

(c) What additional information would you need to determine the predictive value of the test<br />

3.5.3 Oexle et al. (A-7) calculated the negative predictive value of a test for carriers of X-linked ornithine<br />

transcarbamylase deficiency (OTCD—a disorder of the urea cycle). A test known as the “allopurinol<br />

test” is often used as a screening device of potential carriers whose relatives are OTCD patients.<br />

They cited a study by Brusilow and Horwich (A-8) that estimated the sensitivity of the allopurinol<br />

test as .927. Oexle et al. themselves estimated the specificity of the allopurinol test as .997.<br />

Also they estimated the prevalence in the population of individuals with OTCD as 132000. Use<br />

this information and Bayes’s theorem to calculate the predictive value negative of the allopurinol<br />

screening test.<br />

3.6 SUMMARY<br />

In this chapter some of the basic ideas and concepts of probability were presented. The<br />

objective has been to provide enough of a “feel” for the subject so that the probabilistic<br />

aspects of statistical inference can be more readily understood and appreciated when<br />

this topic is presented later.<br />

We defined probability as a number between 0 and 1 that measures the likelihood<br />

of the occurrence of some event. We distinguished between subjective probability and<br />

objective probability. Objective probability can be categorized further as classical or relative<br />

frequency probability. After stating the three properties of probability, we defined<br />

and illustrated the calculation of the following kinds of probabilities: marginal, joint, and<br />

conditional. We also learned how to apply the addition and multiplication rules to<br />

find certain probabilities. We learned the meaning of independent, mutually exclusive,<br />

and complementary events. We learned the meaning of specificity, sensitivity, predictive<br />

value positive, and predictive value negative as applied to a screening test or disease<br />

symptom. Finally, we learned how to use Bayes’s theorem to calculate the probability<br />

that a subject has a disease, given that the subject has a positive screening test result<br />

(or has the symptom of interest).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!