17.01.2015 Views

LibraryPirate

LibraryPirate

LibraryPirate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

688 CHAPTER 13 NONPARAMETRIC AND DISTRIBUTION-FREE STATISTICS<br />

TABLE 13.3.2 Scores Above () and Below () the Hypothesized Median Based<br />

on Data of Example 13.3.1<br />

Girl 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />

Score relative to - 0<br />

hypothesized<br />

median<br />

+<br />

+<br />

+<br />

+<br />

+<br />

+<br />

+<br />

+<br />

approximately equal. This line of reasoning suggests an alternative way in<br />

which we could have stated the null hypothesis, namely, that the probability<br />

of a plus is equal to the probability of a minus, and these probabilities are<br />

equal to .5. Stated symbolically, the hypothesis would be<br />

H 0 : P1+2 = P1-2 = .5<br />

In other words, we would expect about the same number of plus signs as<br />

minus signs in Table 13.3.2 when H 0 is true. A look at Table 13.3.2 reveals<br />

a preponderance of pluses; specifically, we observe eight pluses, one minus,<br />

and one zero, which was assigned to the score that fell exactly on the median.<br />

The usual procedure for handling zeros is to eliminate them from the analysis<br />

and reduce n, the sample size, accordingly. If we follow this procedure,<br />

our problem reduces to one consisting of nine observations of which eight<br />

are plus and one is minus.<br />

Since the number of pluses and minuses is not the same, we wonder if<br />

the distribution of signs is sufficiently disproportionate to cast doubt on our<br />

hypothesis. Stated another way, we wonder if this small a number of minuses<br />

could have come about by chance alone when the null hypothesis is true, or if<br />

the number is so small that something other than chance (that is, a false null<br />

hypothesis) is responsible for the results.<br />

Based on what we learned in Chapter 4, it seems reasonable to conclude<br />

that the observations in Table 13.3.2 constitute a set of n independent<br />

random variables from the Bernoulli population with parameter p. If we let<br />

k = the test statistic, the sampling distribution of k is the binomial probability<br />

distribution with parameter p = .5 if the null hypothesis is true.<br />

6. Decision rule. The decision rule depends on the alternative hypothesis.<br />

For H A : P1+2 7 P1-2, reject H 0 if, when H 0 is true, the probability<br />

of observing k or fewer minus signs is less than or equal to a.<br />

For H A : P1+2 6 P1-2, reject H 0 if the probability of observing,<br />

when H 0 is true, k or fewer plus signs is equal to or less than a.<br />

For H A : P1+2 Z P1-2, reject H 0 if (given that H 0 is true) the probability<br />

of obtaining a value of k as extreme as or more extreme than<br />

was actually computed is equal to or less than a>2.<br />

For this example the decision rule is: Reject H 0 if the p value for the<br />

computed test statistic is less than or equal to .05.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!