06.03.2015 Views

Teaching Subjectivity. Travelling Selves for Feminist ... - MailChimp

Teaching Subjectivity. Travelling Selves for Feminist ... - MailChimp

Teaching Subjectivity. Travelling Selves for Feminist ... - MailChimp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a ‘materiality’ of connections, a provisional coherence of joint being(s), some<br />

‘real’ rootedness, their presence. A style that connotes a unique way of being in<br />

the world and that completely fits to each of them separately was outside the<br />

range of any possible collecting procedure. I ‘exercised’ remembering. Writing,<br />

walking, carrying oneself, facing problems, articulating feminist questions, all<br />

these moments connote the virtue of their particular style.<br />

My primary impetus in responding to the loss was to keep them as (a)<br />

whole(s) with and within me, to carry them beyond any theoretical analysis or<br />

response to the issue. Knowledge itself was neither a key nor an entry but a gentleness<br />

of emotions which in intrinsic waves spoke both in public and in myself<br />

honouring them, <strong>for</strong>matting a discourse on honouring them, responding to<br />

the call. I tried intensively to keep saying their names publicly and privately, to<br />

keep ceaselessly reading their texts, to keep continuously writing about them in<br />

the gap between facing loss and a time of mourning which would never arrive<br />

in its final shape. At this point I echoed Derrida’s explanation that the inability<br />

of acceptance defined that which mourning itself is, namely “the history of its<br />

refusal” 15 . There<strong>for</strong>e, “(t)he work on mourning is not,” as the abovementioned<br />

author pointed out in his article By Force of Mourning “(…) one kind of work<br />

among other possible kinds; an activity of the kind of ‘work’ is by no means a<br />

specific figure <strong>for</strong> production in general” 16 .<br />

The moment when I accepted the temptation to work on this very<br />

challenging task, I realised not only how this particular ‘travelling’ assumes<br />

multiple ef<strong>for</strong>ts of Self in its dramatic and often unknown setting, but how<br />

any claim <strong>for</strong> an auto/biographical narrative resists the politics of closure or<br />

its own imaginative order. Along with facing my own limitations <strong>for</strong> critical<br />

insights, this quest seemed very difficult, especially in terms of inner-positioning.<br />

Numerous dilemmas suddenly appeared. Is it about the issue of personal<br />

mourning after the loss of the feminists with whom I shared very often an<br />

inexplicable closeness or a peculiar concept of nostalgia <strong>for</strong> recalling a joint<br />

feminist past or both that turned out to be an invocation? Do I think of me<br />

and my loneliness? Or is it about my ultimate will to work on mourning as an<br />

act of personal responsibility?<br />

The very meaning of death and loss and the ways in which they resonate<br />

towards the meaning of the lives of those who continue to live, are ontological<br />

15<br />

Jacques Derrida, Cinders (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1991), 55.<br />

16<br />

Jacques Derrida, “Excerpt from By Force of Mourning by Jacques Derrida,” transl. by Pascale-Anne Brault and<br />

Michael Naas, Critical Inquiry, (Winter 1996).<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!