06.03.2015 Views

Teaching Subjectivity. Travelling Selves for Feminist ... - MailChimp

Teaching Subjectivity. Travelling Selves for Feminist ... - MailChimp

Teaching Subjectivity. Travelling Selves for Feminist ... - MailChimp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Implications <strong>for</strong> teaching<br />

“‘What is it in the Other that I have lost?’ – posits the ‘I’ in the mode of unknowingness”<br />

is how Judith Butler in her book Precarious Life. The Powers of<br />

Mourning and Violence 27 (Butler 2004b, 30) explored the very momentum of<br />

facing loss. It can be a moving point from where we may begin a reflection of<br />

how this issue, as one of the most vulnerable and profound of life’s experiences,<br />

can affect teaching, both the content and meaning of teaching.<br />

The task is implicitly harsh as there is a dense web of human dilemmas<br />

that at the same time prevents us from going beyond the conventional<br />

order usually embedded in a memoryscape or locked in secure public rituals of<br />

mourning but also challenges us to find potential answers.<br />

Loss, particularly the loss of dear ones, underlies a complexity of uncertainties<br />

that refers to various points, concerns and states of emotion, yet there<br />

are some opportunities <strong>for</strong> openness to often unanswerable and unreachable<br />

questions. What are the trans<strong>for</strong>mative effects of loss? Can students identify<br />

with one’s own loss and is the classroom a suitable place <strong>for</strong> a fruitful exchange<br />

of these trans<strong>for</strong>mational opportunities? What are the outcomes that have<br />

effects that differ from the effects of the process of healing? How to teach,<br />

or rather what to teach when human loss is accompanied with grieving and<br />

unexplainable vulnerability matters? Emotional exposure, human rupture,<br />

grieving, human bonding, work at mourning?<br />

Derrida was quite precise saying that there is no possibility of being<br />

taught how to live or how to accept death. Humans are, in his view, “all<br />

survivors on deferral” (Derrida 2004) but also inheritors of others with whom<br />

they feel an affinity. Coming back to Butler’s previous point, I found here a<br />

kind of interrelatedness as well as a potential <strong>for</strong>, or promise of, a departure.<br />

The position of the Self as unknowingness in a situation of the loss of<br />

the Other, although presuming an uneasiness, anxiety, despair and drifting,<br />

means above all ‘I’ “as infinite layers” 28 , never unified, total, closed but impregnated<br />

and embodied by and through others, and in that sense Self functions<br />

in a particular way as an inheritor of them (others). There<strong>for</strong>e, the importance<br />

of inventing new theorising and teaching methods relating to loss, mourning<br />

and grief, despite all epistemological and human limitations and ambiguity,<br />

is present and could be developed in a few directions. First, one should offer<br />

27<br />

Judith Butler, Precarious Life. The Powers of Mourning and Violence (London and New York: Verso, 2004).<br />

28<br />

Trinh T. Minh-ha, Woman Native Other (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1989), 94.<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!