- Page 2: Beyond Bioethics: A Proposal for Mo
- Page 5 and 6: (ARTs) as well as laboratory resear
- Page 7 and 8: issues raised by new biotechnologie
- Page 9 and 10: human and animals cells, tissues, a
- Page 11 and 12: (CLIA) of 1988 and, more importantl
- Page 13 and 14: the activities of both private and
- Page 15 and 16: themselves whether or not to eat fo
- Page 17 and 18: 5.5 Creating a New Regulatory Insti
- Page 19 and 20: egarding reproductive biomedicine t
- Page 21 and 22: to represent constituencies that ar
- Page 23 and 24: “Deliberative panels,” the term
- Page 25 and 26: participants may be able to engage
- Page 27: outer limits of the right to privac
- Page 32 and 33: Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Page 34 and 35: 4.6 BIBLIOGRAPHY...................
- Page 36 and 37: 10.8.2 Consensus Conferences ......
- Page 38: SKINNER V. OKLAHOMA (1942) ........
- Page 41 and 42: When societal concerns about biotec
- Page 43 and 44: On the other hand, certain historic
- Page 45 and 46: enterprise that should be shielded
- Page 47 and 48: in the standard-setting process can
- Page 49 and 50: Many people (ourselves included) ar
- Page 52 and 53: 2 Human Growth Hormones for Childre
- Page 54 and 55: 2.2 Is There a Need for Legal Guida
- Page 56 and 57: […] I really think there should b
- Page 58 and 59: FDA. The expert in question pointed
- Page 60 and 61: 2.4 Broadening the Ethical Debate A
- Page 62: Whether the broad availability of s
- Page 66 and 67: 3 Ethical Principles No proposal fo
- Page 68 and 69: infertile parents have been enormou
- Page 70 and 71: to population-level changes in huma
- Page 72 and 73: New reproductive possibilities that
- Page 74: Accordingly, our proposal for a new
- Page 78 and 79:
4 New Frontiers of Reproductive Sci
- Page 80 and 81:
4.2 Standard Reproductive Technique
- Page 82 and 83:
United States. According to a 2002
- Page 84 and 85:
treatment surfaces, it is usually a
- Page 86 and 87:
inherited foreign DNA is minuscule,
- Page 88 and 89:
the institution of the family, as i
- Page 90 and 91:
almost without saying. Children bor
- Page 92 and 93:
ecent review of the scientific lite
- Page 94 and 95:
Aware of the controversial nature o
- Page 96 and 97:
diagnostic technologies. This study
- Page 98 and 99:
eproductive medicine (See chapter 6
- Page 100 and 101:
this argument implies that there is
- Page 102 and 103:
cellular tissue compatible with the
- Page 104 and 105:
exclusively for the purpose it was
- Page 106 and 107:
4.5.3 Making Eggs After twenty year
- Page 108 and 109:
As for many other medical technolog
- Page 110 and 111:
Several scientists expressed seriou
- Page 112 and 113:
4.6 Bibliography Abboud, Leila. "FD
- Page 114 and 115:
Derbyshire, David. Foetuses Had Thr
- Page 116 and 117:
Pilcher, Helen R. Could We Defeat t
- Page 118 and 119:
Wade, Nicholas. "Is the World Ready
- Page 120 and 121:
5 The Current Legal and Regulatory
- Page 122 and 123:
on a clinic-by-clinic basis could b
- Page 124 and 125:
eligibility” rule, and a “good
- Page 126 and 127:
and enforcement difficulties can pa
- Page 128 and 129:
considers the scope and depth of th
- Page 130 and 131:
and/or any organs derived from huma
- Page 132 and 133:
D.C., since 2001, the Congress has
- Page 134 and 135:
ureaucratic. As we discuss in more
- Page 136 and 137:
12 days old, as well as safeguards
- Page 138 and 139:
conducting targeted inspections of
- Page 140 and 141:
countries have imposed strict limit
- Page 142 and 143:
As for other programs of self-regul
- Page 144 and 145:
and dialogue among all relevant ind
- Page 146 and 147:
justifiable is the assumption that
- Page 148 and 149:
5.4 Bibliography Ahmed, Amer S. "Th
- Page 150 and 151:
Malinowski, Michael J., and Robin J
- Page 152 and 153:
6 International Legislative and Reg
- Page 154 and 155:
Health Ministry, and sets aside fun
- Page 156 and 157:
allowing the cryopreservation of oo
- Page 158 and 159:
that the cloned embryo have an iden
- Page 160 and 161:
derived from embryos created before
- Page 162 and 163:
RIHEA Sections 20 through 28 govern
- Page 164 and 165:
guaranteeing access to procreative
- Page 166 and 167:
progress over time may provide new
- Page 168 and 169:
whereas in Britain they must be ren
- Page 170 and 171:
three instead of the usual five yea
- Page 172 and 173:
address ethical controversies - the
- Page 174 and 175:
embryos, 78 the act regulates the c
- Page 176 and 177:
This provision has important conseq
- Page 178 and 179:
Schedule 2, Article 1 enumerates th
- Page 180 and 181:
decision by the licensing committee
- Page 182 and 183:
among Scandinavian countries; Swede
- Page 184 and 185:
6.6 Bibliography Caulfield, Timothy
- Page 186 and 187:
7 Constitutional Constraints? 7.1 T
- Page 188 and 189:
are likely to limit the number of r
- Page 190 and 191:
that has been denied access to pre-
- Page 192 and 193:
deeply rooted in this Nation’s hi
- Page 194 and 195:
engage in sodomy […].” 23 By a
- Page 196 and 197:
to bear or beget a child.”). 29 L
- Page 198 and 199:
The emphasis placed by the Court on
- Page 200 and 201:
Selecting “freedom of intimate as
- Page 202 and 203:
contribute to shaping individuality
- Page 204 and 205:
year of age or younger living in a
- Page 206 and 207:
information do not provide an adequ
- Page 208 and 209:
7.5 Bibliography Ackerman, Bruce. "
- Page 210 and 211:
8 Public Sentiments Toward New Repr
- Page 212 and 213:
outweighed” the harm. By contrast
- Page 214 and 215:
thought that cloning human beings w
- Page 216 and 217:
Over the last few years, organized
- Page 218 and 219:
esearch as desirable. Generic expre
- Page 220 and 221:
To the extent possible, we have agg
- Page 222 and 223:
Therapeutic and enhancing applicati
- Page 224 and 225:
clear” had remained at 34 percent
- Page 226 and 227:
significant majority of Americans c
- Page 228 and 229:
some detail in chapter 10.1 Here, w
- Page 230 and 231:
8.9 Bibliography Annas, George J. "
- Page 232 and 233:
9 Possible Societal Responses In th
- Page 234 and 235:
Neither Zavos and Antinori nor the
- Page 236 and 237:
present case there is any specific
- Page 238 and 239:
disciplining tool. Furthermore, by
- Page 240 and 241:
mechanisms of information monitorin
- Page 242 and 243:
consequences brought about by ill-i
- Page 244 and 245:
harmed for the greater good of the
- Page 246 and 247:
9.5 Bibliography Adamson, David. "R
- Page 248 and 249:
10 Correcting Political and Regulat
- Page 250 and 251:
is competitive - as long as the mar
- Page 252 and 253:
moment of conception, a new being e
- Page 254 and 255:
contributing factor is strategic be
- Page 256 and 257:
provides considerable ammunition to
- Page 258 and 259:
submit public comments, it is usual
- Page 260 and 261:
a fairly limited spectrum of the po
- Page 262 and 263:
that medical personnel often encour
- Page 264 and 265:
affected by a negative decision. In
- Page 266 and 267:
consultations. 36 These doubts are
- Page 268 and 269:
ioethical dilemma, the credibility
- Page 270 and 271:
concerned about their public image.
- Page 272 and 273:
level, where bureaucratic authority
- Page 274 and 275:
method of choice at all levels of g
- Page 276 and 277:
and lay out its main elements. We t
- Page 278 and 279:
There is also some evidence that on
- Page 280 and 281:
10.9 Public Participation at the Fe
- Page 282 and 283:
which only business and developers
- Page 284 and 285:
this view of politics, there is no
- Page 286 and 287:
Superfund Community Involvement Too
- Page 288 and 289:
more deliberative CAGs may produce
- Page 290 and 291:
10.10 Bibliography Ackerman, Stark.
- Page 292 and 293:
Harvey, John C. Distinctly Human: T
- Page 294 and 295:
Schicktanz, Silke, and Jörg Nauman
- Page 296 and 297:
11 Independent Agencies 11.1 Why an
- Page 298 and 299:
inefficiency, neglect of duty, or m
- Page 300 and 301:
capture than executive agencies pla
- Page 302 and 303:
does little to directly affect the
- Page 304 and 305:
that independent commissions tend t
- Page 306 and 307:
eflection of the committee size as
- Page 308 and 309:
should not be taken to suggest that
- Page 310 and 311:
then an equal number of representat
- Page 312 and 313:
or individuals who have been select
- Page 314 and 315:
How should these individuals be ide
- Page 316 and 317:
11.3 Bibliography Bainbridge, Steph
- Page 318 and 319:
12 Designing Mechanisms of Public C
- Page 320 and 321:
public consultation is immune to th
- Page 322 and 323:
public consultation is modest, and
- Page 324 and 325:
proposing here. More than 130 indiv
- Page 326 and 327:
underlying motives informing opposi
- Page 328 and 329:
administrative record and form the
- Page 330 and 331:
12.4 Bibliography Barber, Benjamin
- Page 332 and 333:
13 Implementation Issues Consistent
- Page 334 and 335:
tracking and monitoring system woul
- Page 336 and 337:
that he had falsified some of the d
- Page 338 and 339:
information is stored in a database
- Page 340 and 341:
Failure to acknowledge this fact, s
- Page 342 and 343:
assessment of possible health and s
- Page 344 and 345:
many procedures the industry regard
- Page 346 and 347:
likely to meet with fierce resistan
- Page 348 and 349:
of oversight as laid out in this re
- Page 350 and 351:
collusion between inspectors and in
- Page 352 and 353:
Consider first the scope of the HFE
- Page 354 and 355:
There is some evidence that the bio
- Page 356 and 357:
13.8 Bibliography Afsah, Shakeb, an
- Page 358:
Schneider, Eric C., and Arnold M. E