Final Report (all chapters)

Recommendations

Info

Accordingly, our proposal for a new regulatory entity is largely immune with regard to changes in the medical procedures or research protocols to be banned or regulated. Ours, in other words is an argument for selectively strengthening the administrative state and not merely an examination of arguments for or against the medical procedure or the scientific experiment of the day, an argument that is laid out in the remainder of this report. 71
Page 2:
Beyond Bioethics: A Proposal for Mo
Page 5 and 6:
(ARTs) as well as laboratory resear
Page 7 and 8:
issues raised by new biotechnologie
Page 9 and 10:
human and animals cells, tissues, a
Page 11 and 12:
(CLIA) of 1988 and, more importantl
Page 13 and 14:
the activities of both private and
Page 15 and 16:
themselves whether or not to eat fo
Page 17 and 18:
5.5 Creating a New Regulatory Insti
Page 19 and 20:
egarding reproductive biomedicine t
Page 21 and 22:
to represent constituencies that ar
Page 23 and 24: “Deliberative panels,” the term
Page 25 and 26: participants may be able to engage
Page 27 and 28: outer limits of the right to privac
Page 30: About the Authors Francis Fukuyama
Page 33 and 34: 1.1 THE CHALLENGE OF NEW BIOTECHNOL
Page 35 and 36: 7.1 TRADITIONAL REPRODUCTIVE TECHNO
Page 37 and 38: Shortness as a Psychological and So
Page 40 and 41: 1 Introduction This report presents
Page 42 and 43: them only on the basis of safety an
Page 44 and 45: esearch, and clinical and medical p
Page 46 and 47: Congress’ powers over scientific
Page 48 and 49: of newborns; destruction of an embr
Page 50: 1.6 Bibliography Evans, John H. Pla
Page 53 and 54: endogenous growth hormone secretion
Page 55 and 56: slippery slope toward blanket uses
Page 57 and 58: proposed by Eli Lilly - a rather su
Page 59 and 60: Committee tended, predictably, to r
Page 61 and 62: coincidentally, she was also one of
Page 64: 2.5 Bibliography American Academy o
Page 67 and 68: • Limits on the commercialization
Page 69 and 70: the sick and relieving the pain and
Page 71 and 72: give for opposing this practice var
Page 73: We recognize that for some people,
Page 78 and 79: 4 New Frontiers of Reproductive Sci
Page 80 and 81: 4.2 Standard Reproductive Technique
Page 82 and 83: United States. According to a 2002
Page 84 and 85: treatment surfaces, it is usually a
Page 86 and 87: inherited foreign DNA is minuscule,
Page 88 and 89: the institution of the family, as i
Page 90 and 91: almost without saying. Children bor
Page 92 and 93: ecent review of the scientific lite
Page 94 and 95: Aware of the controversial nature o
Page 96 and 97: diagnostic technologies. This study
Page 98 and 99: eproductive medicine (See chapter 6
Page 100 and 101: this argument implies that there is
Page 102 and 103: cellular tissue compatible with the
Page 104 and 105: exclusively for the purpose it was
Page 106 and 107: 4.5.3 Making Eggs After twenty year
Page 108 and 109: As for many other medical technolog
Page 110 and 111: Several scientists expressed seriou
Page 112 and 113: 4.6 Bibliography Abboud, Leila. "FD
Page 114 and 115: Derbyshire, David. Foetuses Had Thr
Page 116 and 117: Pilcher, Helen R. Could We Defeat t
Page 118 and 119: Wade, Nicholas. "Is the World Ready
Page 120 and 121: 5 The Current Legal and Regulatory
Page 122 and 123: on a clinic-by-clinic basis could b
Page 124 and 125:
eligibility” rule, and a “good
Page 126 and 127:
and enforcement difficulties can pa
Page 128 and 129:
considers the scope and depth of th
Page 130 and 131:
and/or any organs derived from huma
Page 132 and 133:
D.C., since 2001, the Congress has
Page 134 and 135:
ureaucratic. As we discuss in more
Page 136 and 137:
12 days old, as well as safeguards
Page 138 and 139:
conducting targeted inspections of
Page 140 and 141:
countries have imposed strict limit
Page 142 and 143:
As for other programs of self-regul
Page 144 and 145:
and dialogue among all relevant ind
Page 146 and 147:
justifiable is the assumption that
Page 148 and 149:
5.4 Bibliography Ahmed, Amer S. "Th
Page 150 and 151:
Malinowski, Michael J., and Robin J
Page 152 and 153:
6 International Legislative and Reg
Page 154 and 155:
Health Ministry, and sets aside fun
Page 156 and 157:
allowing the cryopreservation of oo
Page 158 and 159:
that the cloned embryo have an iden
Page 160 and 161:
derived from embryos created before
Page 162 and 163:
RIHEA Sections 20 through 28 govern
Page 164 and 165:
guaranteeing access to procreative
Page 166 and 167:
progress over time may provide new
Page 168 and 169:
whereas in Britain they must be ren
Page 170 and 171:
three instead of the usual five yea
Page 172 and 173:
address ethical controversies - the
Page 174 and 175:
embryos, 78 the act regulates the c
Page 176 and 177:
This provision has important conseq
Page 178 and 179:
Schedule 2, Article 1 enumerates th
Page 180 and 181:
decision by the licensing committee
Page 182 and 183:
among Scandinavian countries; Swede
Page 184 and 185:
6.6 Bibliography Caulfield, Timothy
Page 186 and 187:
7 Constitutional Constraints? 7.1 T
Page 188 and 189:
are likely to limit the number of r
Page 190 and 191:
that has been denied access to pre-
Page 192 and 193:
deeply rooted in this Nation’s hi
Page 194 and 195:
engage in sodomy […].” 23 By a
Page 196 and 197:
to bear or beget a child.”). 29 L
Page 198 and 199:
The emphasis placed by the Court on
Page 200 and 201:
Selecting “freedom of intimate as
Page 202 and 203:
contribute to shaping individuality
Page 204 and 205:
year of age or younger living in a
Page 206 and 207:
information do not provide an adequ
Page 208 and 209:
7.5 Bibliography Ackerman, Bruce. "
Page 210 and 211:
8 Public Sentiments Toward New Repr
Page 212 and 213:
outweighed” the harm. By contrast
Page 214 and 215:
thought that cloning human beings w
Page 216 and 217:
Over the last few years, organized
Page 218 and 219:
esearch as desirable. Generic expre
Page 220 and 221:
To the extent possible, we have agg
Page 222 and 223:
Therapeutic and enhancing applicati
Page 224 and 225:
clear” had remained at 34 percent
Page 226 and 227:
significant majority of Americans c
Page 228 and 229:
some detail in chapter 10.1 Here, w
Page 230 and 231:
8.9 Bibliography Annas, George J. "
Page 232 and 233:
9 Possible Societal Responses In th
Page 234 and 235:
Neither Zavos and Antinori nor the
Page 236 and 237:
present case there is any specific
Page 238 and 239:
disciplining tool. Furthermore, by
Page 240 and 241:
mechanisms of information monitorin
Page 242 and 243:
consequences brought about by ill-i
Page 244 and 245:
harmed for the greater good of the
Page 246 and 247:
9.5 Bibliography Adamson, David. "R
Page 248 and 249:
10 Correcting Political and Regulat
Page 250 and 251:
is competitive - as long as the mar
Page 252 and 253:
moment of conception, a new being e
Page 254 and 255:
contributing factor is strategic be
Page 256 and 257:
provides considerable ammunition to
Page 258 and 259:
submit public comments, it is usual
Page 260 and 261:
a fairly limited spectrum of the po
Page 262 and 263:
that medical personnel often encour
Page 264 and 265:
affected by a negative decision. In
Page 266 and 267:
consultations. 36 These doubts are
Page 268 and 269:
ioethical dilemma, the credibility
Page 270 and 271:
concerned about their public image.
Page 272 and 273:
level, where bureaucratic authority
Page 274 and 275:
method of choice at all levels of g
Page 276 and 277:
and lay out its main elements. We t
Page 278 and 279:
There is also some evidence that on
Page 280 and 281:
10.9 Public Participation at the Fe
Page 282 and 283:
which only business and developers
Page 284 and 285:
this view of politics, there is no
Page 286 and 287:
Superfund Community Involvement Too
Page 288 and 289:
more deliberative CAGs may produce
Page 290 and 291:
10.10 Bibliography Ackerman, Stark.
Page 292 and 293:
Harvey, John C. Distinctly Human: T
Page 294 and 295:
Schicktanz, Silke, and Jörg Nauman
Page 296 and 297:
11 Independent Agencies 11.1 Why an
Page 298 and 299:
inefficiency, neglect of duty, or m
Page 300 and 301:
capture than executive agencies pla
Page 302 and 303:
does little to directly affect the
Page 304 and 305:
that independent commissions tend t
Page 306 and 307:
eflection of the committee size as
Page 308 and 309:
should not be taken to suggest that
Page 310 and 311:
then an equal number of representat
Page 312 and 313:
or individuals who have been select
Page 314 and 315:
How should these individuals be ide
Page 316 and 317:
11.3 Bibliography Bainbridge, Steph
Page 318 and 319:
12 Designing Mechanisms of Public C
Page 320 and 321:
public consultation is immune to th
Page 322 and 323:
public consultation is modest, and
Page 324 and 325:
proposing here. More than 130 indiv
Page 326 and 327:
underlying motives informing opposi
Page 328 and 329:
administrative record and form the
Page 330 and 331:
12.4 Bibliography Barber, Benjamin
Page 332 and 333:
13 Implementation Issues Consistent
Page 334 and 335:
tracking and monitoring system woul
Page 336 and 337:
that he had falsified some of the d
Page 338 and 339:
information is stored in a database
Page 340 and 341:
Failure to acknowledge this fact, s
Page 342 and 343:
assessment of possible health and s
Page 344 and 345:
many procedures the industry regard
Page 346 and 347:
likely to meet with fierce resistan
Page 348 and 349:
of oversight as laid out in this re
Page 350 and 351:
collusion between inspectors and in
Page 352 and 353:
Consider first the scope of the HFE
Page 354 and 355:
There is some evidence that the bio
Page 356 and 357:
13.8 Bibliography Afsah, Shakeb, an
Page 358:
Schneider, Eric C., and Arnold M. E
show all

Final Report (all chapters)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?