09.03.2015 Views

Final Report (all chapters)

Final Report (all chapters)

Final Report (all chapters)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10.9 Public Participation at the Federal Level<br />

The post-World War II era has witnessed a continuous expansion of public participation<br />

efforts in administrative decision-making. “Public participation” originates in the concept of selfgovernance,<br />

a concept that, like accountability, is at the core of many American institutions of<br />

government. Numerous instances of federal statutes include provisions for public involvement<br />

above and beyond the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. Among these statutes<br />

are the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Resource Conservation and Recovery<br />

Act of 1994, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of<br />

1980, and the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Other statutes that mandate public participation<br />

are the Clean Water Act of 1972 72 and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972. 73 The<br />

Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 requires public participation before issuing a<br />

lease of public lands. 74 Agencies such as the EPA and the DOE have promulgated regulations<br />

that mandate public involvement for a variety of federal statutes. For example, 40 C.F.R. 25.7<br />

(1989) requires establishing citizen advisory groups under the Clean Water Act, the Resource<br />

Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Safe Drinking Water Act.<br />

Statutes requiring broader public participation in the rule-making process reflect mainly the<br />

expectation that public involvement will increase confidence in federal agencies operating in<br />

controversial regulatory environments and prevent conflicts and reduce litigation. For this<br />

reason, federal regulators’ experience in implementing these provisions is of considerable<br />

interest to our discussion. As we show in the remainder of this chapter, these expectations often<br />

are not met, partly because Congress provides precious little guidance on how an agency should<br />

implement these provisions, but also because these statutes do not address the inherent tension<br />

between administrative prerogatives and public demands. Confronted with a host of difficult<br />

implementation questions, an unpredictable, noisy, and uninformed public, and aggressive<br />

interest groups, federal agencies have responded by adopting administrative strategies that<br />

minimize public input by restricting the scope of public comments, by soliciting public input at a<br />

late stage in the policy-making process, and by relying heavily on public hearings. In short,<br />

statutory provisions mandating public involvement have often not produced the expected results.<br />

In the next two sections, we elaborate on these themes by focusing on two statutes, the National<br />

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response,<br />

Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).<br />

72<br />

73<br />

74<br />

See 33 U.S.C. 1251(e) (1994).<br />

See 5 U.S.C. 1-15 (1972).<br />

See 30 U.S.C.A. 226(f) (1986).<br />

277

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!