21.03.2015 Views

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

536 HOMOBASIDIOMYCETES<br />

Breeding of Agaricus bisporus<br />

The development of new strains of A. bisporus<br />

with superior qualities such as more efficient<br />

substrate conversion rates, rapid fruiting, higher<br />

yield, resistance <strong>to</strong> disease, ease of picking,<br />

extended shelf-life, better appearance, flavour<br />

or consistency is actively pursued by the mushroom<br />

industry (see Raper, 1985; Sonnenberg,<br />

2000). This task is difficult but worthwhile in<br />

view of the high commercial value of the crop,<br />

and various techniques are being used:<br />

1. Selection of strains collected in the field<br />

and arising during cultivation.<br />

2. Hybridization. The small amount of variation<br />

in the gene pool of commercial s<strong>to</strong>cks of<br />

A. bisporus creates little scope for recombination.<br />

However, a search for new genetic resources<br />

within wild Agaricus populations, the Agaricus<br />

Resource Program (ARP), has made available<br />

novel germ plasm which will prove useful in<br />

breeding (Kerrigan, 1996). Of particular interest<br />

is the discovery in the Sonoran desert (California)<br />

of tetrasporic populations, named A. bisporus var.<br />

burnettii, which are completely interfertile with<br />

commercial lines (Kerrigan et al., 1994; Kerrigan,<br />

1995). Agaricus bisporus var. eurotetrasporus,<br />

another four-spored variety, has been discovered<br />

in Europe. Whilst var. burnettii is amphithallic<br />

and predominantly heterothallic, var. eurotetrasporus<br />

is homothallic (Callac et al., 2003).<br />

3. Pro<strong>to</strong>plast fusion. The fusion of pro<strong>to</strong>plasts<br />

from different homokaryons is an alternative <strong>to</strong><br />

the conventional hybridization technique involving<br />

the pairing of compatible homokaryotic<br />

mycelia.<br />

4. Transformation (genetic modification)<br />

using Agrobacterium as a vec<strong>to</strong>r for the transforming<br />

DNA is also possible, but genetically modified<br />

food products are unpopular with consumers<br />

and certain political parties.<br />

Macrolepiota (30 spp.)<br />

The best-known species of Macrolepiota are the<br />

parasol M. procera (Fig. 19.14b) and the shaggy<br />

parasol M. rhacodes, both of which grow in parks,<br />

pastures and woodland. They are saprotrophs.<br />

The pale brown fruit bodies are large and<br />

generally considered good <strong>to</strong> eat, although<br />

those of M. rhacodes may cause gastric upsets.<br />

A feature of both species is that the ring<br />

is detachable and is free <strong>to</strong> move up and<br />

down the stem. Macrolepiota procera and<br />

M. rhacodes have been separated from Lepiota,<br />

and Vellinga et al. (2003) have proposed that they<br />

should be separated from each other as well,<br />

with M. procera showing affinities with<br />

Leucoagaricus and Leucocoprinus, and M. rhacodes<br />

with Agaricus.<br />

There are concerns about the ability of<br />

M. procera <strong>to</strong> concentrate mercury absorbed<br />

from the soil in<strong>to</strong> the basidiocarp tissues, with<br />

values in the caps as high as 13 mgg 1 reported<br />

from various sites in Poland. The mercury<br />

content of the caps and stalks was generally<br />

independent of the soil substrate concentration,<br />

suggesting a remarkable ability of the M. procera<br />

mycelium <strong>to</strong> bioconcentrate mercury (Gucia &<br />

Falandysz, 2003).<br />

Coprinus<br />

Molecular evidence indicates a relationship<br />

between lepio<strong>to</strong>id fungi and two species of<br />

Coprinus, namely C. comatus and C. sterquilinus<br />

(Hopple & Vilgalys, 1999; Redhead et al., 2001).<br />

Although it is now possible, with hindsight, <strong>to</strong><br />

recognize other features shared by these species<br />

and other Agaricaceae, e.g. the shaggy surface of<br />

the cap or the moveable annulus (Fig. 19.14c), we<br />

will discuss them in the context of the many<br />

biological features uniting them with their<br />

former allies (see below).<br />

19.4.2 Coprinaceae (now Psathyrellaceae)<br />

Molecular studies have shown that the genus<br />

Coprinus is not monophyletic (Hopple & Vilgalys,<br />

1999; Redhead, 2001; Redhead et al., 2001),<br />

implying that the coprinoid character of deliquescent<br />

gills has evolved more than once.<br />

This finding has caused a taxonomic nightmare<br />

because one of the two species found <strong>to</strong><br />

be related more closely <strong>to</strong> Macrolepiota than<br />

<strong>to</strong> Coprinus happened <strong>to</strong> be the type-species<br />

C. comatus. Its move from the Coprinaceae <strong>to</strong><br />

the Agaricaceae meant that those numerous<br />

species remaining in the Coprinaceae were<br />

given new names, namely Coprinopsis (e.g. C.<br />

atramentarius, C. cinereus, C. lagopus, C.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!