21.03.2015 Views

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

594 HETEROBASIDIOMYCETES<br />

Table 21.1. Orders and selected genera currently<br />

included in the Heterobasidiomycetes. After Wells<br />

and Bandoni (2001).<br />

Subclass Heterobasidiomycetidae<br />

1. Cera<strong>to</strong>basidiales (see below)<br />

Cera<strong>to</strong>basidium (anam. Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia ¼ Cera<strong>to</strong>rhiza).<br />

Thanatephorus (anam. Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia ¼ Moniliopsis).<br />

2. Tulasnellales (see Fig. 21.1b)<br />

Tulasnella (anam. Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia)<br />

3. Dacrymycetales (p. 598)<br />

Calocera<br />

Dacrymyces<br />

Ditiola<br />

4. Auriculariales (p. 601)<br />

Auricularia<br />

Exidia<br />

Pseudohydnum<br />

Sebacina<br />

SubclassTremellomycetidae<br />

1. Tremellales (p. 60 4)<br />

Cryp<strong>to</strong>coccus and Bullera (yeast forms;Table 24.1)<br />

Filobasidiella neoformans (see p.660)<br />

Tremella<br />

2. Christianseniales<br />

3. Filobasidiales (yeast forms; seeTable 24.1)<br />

4. Cys<strong>to</strong>filobasidiales (seeTable 24.1)<br />

Itersonilia (see p.493)<br />

Phaffia, Xanthophyllomyces (see p.665)<br />

5. Trichosporonales (yeastforms; seeTable 24.1)<br />

21.2 Cera<strong>to</strong>basidiales<br />

The most important members of this family<br />

belong <strong>to</strong> the anamorph genus Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia which<br />

we shall consider in detail. Sneh et al. (1996)<br />

and Roberts (1999) have compiled important<br />

reference works on this group. The secondary<br />

hyphae of Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia have conspicuous dolipore<br />

septa which are visible even with the light<br />

microscope (Tu et al., 1977). Electron microscopy<br />

studies have revealed the parenthesomes <strong>to</strong> be<br />

perforated by several large pores (Müller et al.,<br />

1998b). Clamp connections are not found in<br />

Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia but may be present in other members<br />

of the order. The hyphae of Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia are highly<br />

characteristic. Branches typically arise at a right<br />

angle <strong>to</strong> the leading hypha, with the branch<br />

point slightly constricted and a septum located a<br />

little way in<strong>to</strong> the branch (Fig. 21.2a). Depending<br />

on the species, the compartments of vegetative<br />

hyphae are binucleate or multinucleate; uninucleate<br />

hyphae are uncommon. Teleomorphic<br />

states are rare and conidia are not produced,<br />

but sclerotia of the loose type (see Fig. 1.16a) are<br />

frequently seen. The form-genus Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia has<br />

now been broken up in<strong>to</strong> several taxa which<br />

correlate with different teleomorphs (Moore,<br />

1987; Andersen & Stalpers, 1994). For instance,<br />

Moniliopsis has multinucleate hyphae and is<br />

referred <strong>to</strong> the teleomorph genus Thanatephorus<br />

whereas the hyphae of Cera<strong>to</strong>rhiza (teleomorph<br />

Cera<strong>to</strong>basidium) are binucleate (Tu et al., 1977;<br />

Vilgalys & Cubeta, 1994). <strong>Fungi</strong> resembling<br />

Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia transgress the boundaries of<br />

orders, with some teleomorphs referable <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Tulasnellales. Indeed, a few Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia-like fungi<br />

have even been assigned <strong>to</strong> the Ascomycota.<br />

Whereas hyphae of Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia are readily<br />

recognized as such, they offer few microscopic<br />

features for species identification, and a system<br />

based on anas<strong>to</strong>mosis groups, i.e. the ability of<br />

a given isolate <strong>to</strong> undergo plasmogamy with<br />

hyphae of defined tester strains, has been<br />

developed (Sneh et al., 1991). Such pairings may<br />

yield three different responses, with intermediate<br />

reactions also possible. (1) In genetically<br />

identical or closely related strains, anas<strong>to</strong>mosis<br />

leads <strong>to</strong> perfect fusion. (2) In less closely related<br />

members of the same anas<strong>to</strong>mosis group, anas<strong>to</strong>mosis<br />

is followed by death of the fusion cell due<br />

<strong>to</strong> vegetative incompatibility. (3) No anas<strong>to</strong>mosis<br />

occurs between members of different anas<strong>to</strong>mosis<br />

groups. The best-studied taxon, R. solani,<br />

contains about a dozen anas<strong>to</strong>mosis groups,<br />

some of which have been further divided in<strong>to</strong><br />

subgroups according <strong>to</strong> biochemical or other<br />

criteria. Although the individual anas<strong>to</strong>mosis<br />

groups within R. solani and other taxa (e.g.<br />

Cera<strong>to</strong>rhiza) correlate with phylogenetic clusters<br />

obtained by DNA-based phylogeny (Kuninaga<br />

et al., 1997; Gonzalez et al., 2001) and also <strong>to</strong><br />

a certain extent with the range of plant hosts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!