21.03.2015 Views

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BLUMERIA GRAMINIS<br />

393<br />

of the Erysiphales. Affinities with Pyrenomycetes<br />

or Plec<strong>to</strong>mycetes have been proposed in the past<br />

but are not now thought <strong>to</strong> be true. Instead, the<br />

phylogenetic position of the Erysiphales is fairly<br />

isolated, possibly associated weakly with the<br />

Helotiales (Saenz & Taylor, 1999b).<br />

For many years, the taxonomy of genera<br />

and species was based on the system proposed<br />

by Léveillé (1851) who emphasized the features<br />

of the chasmothecium, especially the number of<br />

asci (one or several) and the type of appendage<br />

which may be simple, uncinate (¼ recurved or<br />

hooked), dicho<strong>to</strong>mously branched, or bulbous<br />

(see Fig. 13.1). Recent phylogenetic studies based<br />

on a variety of DNA sequences have revealed that<br />

in the Erysiphales, unlike most other groups of<br />

organisms, the features of asexual reproduction<br />

are more clearly diagnostic than those associated<br />

with sexual reproduction. There is a good correlation<br />

between the anamorphic state and the<br />

groupings obtained by DNA sequence analysis<br />

(Saenz & Taylor, 1999a), and the gross anamorphic<br />

features also correlate with the surface<br />

ornamentations of the conidia as seen by scanning<br />

electron microscopy (Fig. 13.3; Cook et al.,<br />

1997). Thus, the genera of Erysiphales are currently<br />

defined mainly by their anamorphs. In<br />

contrast, the striking chasmothecial appendages<br />

do not correspond well <strong>to</strong> the individual groups<br />

because notably the dicho<strong>to</strong>mous and simple<br />

mycelioid appendages are found in more than<br />

one taxon (Saenz & Taylor, 1999a). One casualty<br />

of these findings is the genus Sphaerotheca with<br />

simple appendages and one ascus per chasmothecium,<br />

which has been incorporated in<strong>to</strong> Podosphaera,<br />

formerly comprising only species with<br />

chasmothecia containing one ascus but bearing<br />

appendages with dicho<strong>to</strong>mously branched tips<br />

(Braun et al., 2002).<br />

We have encountered a great plasticity of<br />

appendages on ascocarps before, especially in the<br />

Plec<strong>to</strong>mycetes where they may be involved in<br />

insect dispersal (see p. 289). In contrast, in the<br />

Erysiphales the chasmothecial appendages seem<br />

<strong>to</strong> be related <strong>to</strong> the type of host infected.<br />

According <strong>to</strong> the analyses of Mori et al. (2000),<br />

the most basal species among the Erysiphales is<br />

Parauncinula septata which has uncinate (hooked)<br />

appendages. This species occurs on oak (Fagaceae),<br />

and Mori et al. (2000) have speculated that the<br />

Erysiphales originated on members of the Fagaceae<br />

because that host family hosts by far the<br />

greatest diversity of powdery mildews (Amano,<br />

1986; Braun, 1987, 1995). Together with another<br />

ancestral species possessing chasmothecia with<br />

uncinate appendages, Caespi<strong>to</strong>theca forestalis,<br />

P. septata may have diverged from other powdery<br />

mildews some 80 90 million years ago<br />

(Takamatsu et al., 2005).<br />

Many of the powdery mildews associated<br />

with the leaves of deciduous trees have hooked<br />

or branched appendages, whereas those on evergreen<br />

or herbaceous plants often have simple<br />

(mycelioid) appendages. It is known that complex<br />

appendages facilitate the attachment of chasmothecia<br />

<strong>to</strong> twigs or the bark of host trees for<br />

overwintering (see p. 407; Gadoury & Pearson,<br />

1988; Cortesi et al., 1995), and it must be advantageous<br />

for the primary inoculum in spring <strong>to</strong> be<br />

close <strong>to</strong> the budding leaves, rather than falling<br />

<strong>to</strong> the ground. Mori et al. (2000) proposed that no<br />

such selection pressure may hold for species parasitizing<br />

herbaceous plants, which might have<br />

permitted a reduction in the complexity of appendages<br />

<strong>to</strong> simple mycelioid ones. Such changes<br />

from woody <strong>to</strong> herbaceous hosts accompanied by<br />

the reduction in the complexity of appendages<br />

may have occurred several times independently<br />

within the Erysiphales (Takamatsu et al., 2000).<br />

13.3 Blumeria graminis<br />

Although Blumeria graminis is somewhat atypical<br />

of a powdery mildew in being a pathogen of<br />

grasses and cereals, we shall describe it in detail<br />

because more is known about it than any other<br />

member of the Erysiphales. Blumeria is separated<br />

from Erysiphe on several grounds. The haus<strong>to</strong>rium<br />

of B. graminis is digitate, i.e. it has striking<br />

finger-like projections (Fig. 13.2c), whereas the<br />

haus<strong>to</strong>ria are knob-like in most members of<br />

the Erysiphales. Upon closer inspection, they<br />

also have lobes, but these are tightly folded<br />

round the main haus<strong>to</strong>rial body, giving it a<br />

globose appearance (Bushnell & Gay, 1978).<br />

A second distinguishing feature of B. graminis

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!