21.03.2015 Views

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

408 HYMENOASCOMYCETES: ERYSIPHALES<br />

distinguished from Phyllactinia by its rare chasmothecia<br />

bearing only mycelioid appendages<br />

and by its spear-shaped conidia (Oidiopsis<br />

anamorph).<br />

13.8 Controlofpowderymildew<br />

diseases<br />

Several different strategies are employed <strong>to</strong> control<br />

powdery mildew diseases in various crops,<br />

chemical control and breeding for resistance<br />

being by far the most important in commercial<br />

terms. We describe them here in detail because<br />

the fundamental principles apply <strong>to</strong> diseases<br />

caused by many other groups of fungi within<br />

the Eumycota, as mentioned elsewhere in this<br />

book.<br />

13.8.1 Breeding for resistance<br />

Wheat and barley were among the first crop<br />

plants for which resistance breeding programmes<br />

were initiated almost a century ago,<br />

following Biffen’s (1905) seminal work on the<br />

genetics of resistance <strong>to</strong> wheat stripe rust,<br />

Puccinia striiformis. Initial attempts at resistance<br />

breeding against B. graminis as well as other<br />

biotrophic plant pathogens used major gene<br />

resistance based on introducing single resistance<br />

genes in<strong>to</strong> the cultivar of choice. Numerous such<br />

major resistance genes originating from cereal<br />

cultivars as well as wild grasses related <strong>to</strong> wheat<br />

or barley are now available for breeding purposes<br />

(Hsam & Zeller, 2002). Breeding for major gene<br />

resistance has also been pursued in many other<br />

crops susceptible <strong>to</strong> powdery mildew diseases,<br />

such as melons and cucumbers (Podosphaera<br />

xanthii and Golovinomyces cichoracearum; Jahn<br />

et al., 2002), or clover (Erysiphe trifolii), hops<br />

(Sphaerotheca macularis) and gooseberries<br />

(Sphaerotheca mors-uvae) (see Smith et al., 1988).<br />

Breeding for resistance in slow-growing perennial<br />

crops such as apple or vines is obviously<br />

rather more difficult.<br />

Major gene resistance is usually based on<br />

a recognition mechanism involving the hypersensitive<br />

response (see pp. 397 398). The danger<br />

inherent in major gene resistance breeding is<br />

that the pathogen can overcome resistance by<br />

mutation of its corresponding avirulence allele<br />

<strong>to</strong> virulence. This is a frequent occurrence, e.g. in<br />

B. graminis. On the other hand, the frequency of<br />

virulence alleles in the field may decrease again<br />

in pathogen populations no longer exposed <strong>to</strong><br />

the cultivar and its resistance gene. Further, by<br />

co-ordinating the release of resistant cultivars,<br />

the effect of major gene resistance in crop<br />

protection can be maximized. For instance, the<br />

‘green bridge’ of B. graminis (see p. 399) can be<br />

broken if the summer and winter cereal cultivars<br />

sown in any one year carry different resistance<br />

genes. Further, it is possible <strong>to</strong> combine several<br />

resistance genes in one host variety, a process<br />

known as ‘pyramiding’. This requires the pathogen<br />

<strong>to</strong> develop multiple virulence alleles before<br />

it can infect such a crop variety (Hsam & Zeller,<br />

2002). The danger, of course, lies in the creation<br />

of multiply resistant ‘super-races’ of B. graminis<br />

or other powdery mildews.<br />

An interesting type of resistance in barley is<br />

mediated by the mlo allele which, as mentioned<br />

on p. 397, mediates the formation of very thick<br />

papillae, restricting infection by all races of<br />

B. graminis f. sp. hordei. This resistance is unusual<br />

for a broad-spectrum resistance in giving<br />

almost <strong>to</strong>tal control, and it is exceptional for<br />

a single-gene resistance in that it has remained<br />

stable in barley cultivars since it was<br />

introduced about 20 years ago (Jørgensen, 1994;<br />

Collins et al., 2002). In 1990, 30% of the spring<br />

barley acreage was sown with mlo resistant<br />

barley cultivars (Jørgensen, 1992). More<br />

commonly, broad-spectrum resistance is based<br />

on the combined effects of several minor genes<br />

and it is only partial, i.e. it retards infection<br />

and sporulation of the pathogen but does not<br />

al<strong>to</strong>gether prevent disease. It is sometimes<br />

termed horizontal resistance because it controls<br />

many different races of the pathogen <strong>to</strong> the<br />

same limited level, in contrast <strong>to</strong> vertical<br />

resistance mediated by major resistance genes<br />

in which individual races are controlled <strong>to</strong>tally,<br />

and others not at all. Although the molecular<br />

basis of most resistance genes is still unknown,<br />

it is noteworthy that some genes involved in<br />

horizontal resistance become more effective in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!