24.03.2015 Views

Pharmaceutical Technology: Controlled Drug Release, Volume 2

Pharmaceutical Technology: Controlled Drug Release, Volume 2

Pharmaceutical Technology: Controlled Drug Release, Volume 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CH. 14] COMPARISON OF TIMOLOL MALEATE RELEASE 157<br />

Buffered matrices containing disodium phosphate (2.11 mmol) were prepared as above with the<br />

following exception. The salt was first dissolved in a small amount of distilled water, then<br />

methanol-polymer mixture and the drug were added. The amount of salt in the matrices was 12.5%<br />

or 12.9% (w/w).<br />

Studies of in vitro release<br />

The release of timolol from isopropyl PVM-MA matrices used the rotating disk method [5]. The<br />

dissolution medium was 100 ml of pH 7.42 mM phosphate buffer at 32°C. Ionic strength was<br />

adjusted to 0.5 with sodium chloride. Samples of volume 3.0 ml were withdrawn and replaced by<br />

dissolution medium. Timolol concentrations were analysed with a UV spectrophotometer at 294<br />

nm and the pH was measured.<br />

<strong>Release</strong> rates (%/min) were calculated from the best fits of released drug vs. time plots. The<br />

slopes (k) of the log(released drug) vs. log(time) plots were calculated from the linear leastsquares<br />

regression lines. A slope of 0.5 in the log-log plot indicates diffusional, square root of<br />

time, dependence and a slope of 1.0 indicates zero-order release kinetics [6]. Times of 50% drug<br />

release (t50%) were calculated from the best fits of drug released vs. time plots.<br />

In vivo studies<br />

Matrices of monoisopropyl ester of PVM-MA were carefully applied in the lower conjunctival sac<br />

of rabbits. Inserts did not cause any irritation in rabbit eyes. Plasma and tear fluid samples were<br />

collected at different times during a period of 8 h. Blood samples were taken from the cannulated<br />

ear artery. Plasma was separated by centrifuging (2000 g, 4min) and kept at −20°C until analysed.<br />

Tear fluid samples (1 µl) were collected with microcapillaries at 30, 120, 240 and 480 min after<br />

application of the matrices. Tear fluid samples were diluted in 5 ml of phosphate buffer.<br />

Timolol concentration in plasma and tear fluid samples was measured using a modified<br />

radioreceptor assay [7]. In the assay, displacement of a β-antagonist, (–)- 3 H-CGP-12177, from β-<br />

receptors of rat reticulocyte membranes by timolol was measured. Rat reticulocyte membranes were<br />

obtained as described by Wellstein et al. [7].<br />

In a total volume of 300 µl, 50µl reticulocyte membranes in phosphate buffer (500 µg protein)<br />

were incubated for 60 min at 25°C with 50 µl (30 nCi) of (−)-3H-CGP-12177, 180 µl of plasma<br />

and 20µ1 of 310 mOsm sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Standard curves were run for each<br />

rabbit separately in order to avoid errors due to possible differences in protein binding. To<br />

generate the standard curves, blank plasma was used and incubated in the presence of 1–20 nM<br />

timolol. For the determination of non-specific binding, incubation in a 10 −5 M propranolol<br />

solution was used.<br />

Timolol concentration in tear fluid samples was measured in the same way, but 200 µl of the<br />

diluted tear fluid in phosphate buffer were used instead of 180 µl plasma. After incubation, bound<br />

and free radioligand were separated by vacuum filtration through Whatman GF/F glass fibre<br />

filters. Filters were washed three times with 10 ml ice-cold 310 mOsm phosphate buffer, dried and<br />

counted for retained radioactivity in 5 ml of Lipoluma-Lumasolve-water (10:1:0.2) mixture using

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!