Appendix A_Pages266to338_9MB.pdf - Ottawa Confederation Line
Appendix A_Pages266to338_9MB.pdf - Ottawa Confederation Line
Appendix A_Pages266to338_9MB.pdf - Ottawa Confederation Line
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
You said it was a study not a project!<br />
Extension of the O-Train on existing railway lines is a far superior means of meeting<br />
the community needs for public transit now<br />
How much will it cost, and how long will it take to construct<br />
Tell people what you’re doing and when. The amount of information amount of<br />
information about this project will serve to confuse transit users when the transitway<br />
becomes inoperable. Also, if you have to chose between inconveniencing motor<br />
vehicles and transit operations during construction, the choice should be obvious<br />
I feel that the project is not moving fast enough. OC Transpo and City Council<br />
Smart construction that allows maximum flow of traffic...open unused lanes on<br />
weekends/pm<br />
No concerns<br />
Tunnel is too deep and goes too far north<br />
Le plus tôt possible, SVP!<br />
Expense – distance below grade<br />
I prefer the Carling route to go west from Tunney’s Pasture<br />
Make sure that the bus system is functional through the entire construction process.<br />
You cannot shut down transit to downtown core<br />
Elle doit se faire avec minutie pour être solide et durable tout en se complétant le<br />
plus rapidement possible pour que la population commence à utiliser le service et les<br />
infrastructures aussi tôt que possible. Des matériaux et des respectueux de<br />
l’environnement doivent être utilisés dans toutes les étapes de processus<br />
Cost! Cost! Cost! This may end up costing much more. In a time of increasing<br />
deficits, how far can the Feds and provinces go in helping finance this system?<br />
Cleary tunneling is the preferred – dare we say the only option. Cut and cover won’t<br />
work, but how to control costs, and the duration of construction?<br />
On presume beaucoup<br />
Operation:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Unsafe environment – too much walking – too high a cost<br />
You said it was a study not a project!<br />
Again, how many jobs will it create, or will OC Transpo see a reduction. Will OC<br />
Transpo drivers have first option in operating LRT?<br />
No concerns<br />
Has enough money been allocated for operation and maintenance?<br />
L’esthetique des stations<br />
Keep a few trains 24 hrs, this system needs to be functional for all users, regardless<br />
of their working hours<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Elle doit commencer avec force es susciter la fierté. Elle ne doit pas se limiter, de<br />
quelque façon que ce soit, à des objectifs d’achalandage conservateurs ou peu<br />
ambitieux ainsi que s’astreindre à des critères de simple rentabilité ou, pire, de<br />
profitabilité à court ou à moyen terme. Elle doit au contraire convaincre et attirer<br />
sans cesse<br />
Hopefully automated systems will cut down on costs in the long run. LRT is more<br />
suited to some automation, I believe<br />
On croirait que vous aves “carte blanche”<br />
Je trouve 50 million tres élevée pour géner ce project – je prise déjà à des déponses<br />
non justifies qui vont surgir<br />
From Bernie Geiger:<br />
The whole project appears to be very expensive. The transitway was supposed to easily<br />
convertible. The costs shown for the conversion of the transitway surface parts are<br />
stupendously high. Q5. By tunneling from MacKenzie Bridge/Laurier through<br />
Campus to a portal at the Queensway adds kilometers to expensive tunnel and $100s<br />
> of millions to costs. (The $200 million Baseline Station disaster looks like a bargain<br />
in comparison).<br />
It will take far too many years to plan, design, tender, build, test and break-in. NS<br />
LRT build and test was about 2 years, this will be 2 to 3 times, once design and<br />
tendering is complete.<br />
The City of <strong>Ottawa</strong> does not have the proven track record to plan and successfully<br />
manage a project of this scope and complexity, it is very high risk.<br />
The benefits to users in the core (the primary target audience and problem area) is<br />
negative. They will need to walk further to the core stations, need to take 4 escalators<br />
to get to the platforms, will need to wait longer for a the next train to arrive than the 3<br />
buses per > minute now going along Albert/Slater. Total travel times will be longer<br />
and user experience will not be enhanced.<br />
Tourists, visitors and casual users will be disoriented by the many elevators and twists<br />
and turns they must take to get up and down to/from the stations. On arriving at<br />
street level, strangers will have no idea where they are. This is unlike surface transit<br />
and shallow subways.<br />
There are serious safety and security concerns arising from lost packages/bomb threats,<br />
noxious/poison gas releases, fire, collisions etc. Few people are accustomed and many<br />
are simply not capable of climbing 10 flights of stairs (the depth of the core stations) let<br />
alone in a crowded, stressful emergency environment.