10.04.2015 Views

Appendix A_Pages266to338_9MB.pdf - Ottawa Confederation Line

Appendix A_Pages266to338_9MB.pdf - Ottawa Confederation Line

Appendix A_Pages266to338_9MB.pdf - Ottawa Confederation Line

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

You said it was a study not a project!<br />

Extension of the O-Train on existing railway lines is a far superior means of meeting<br />

the community needs for public transit now<br />

How much will it cost, and how long will it take to construct<br />

Tell people what you’re doing and when. The amount of information amount of<br />

information about this project will serve to confuse transit users when the transitway<br />

becomes inoperable. Also, if you have to chose between inconveniencing motor<br />

vehicles and transit operations during construction, the choice should be obvious<br />

I feel that the project is not moving fast enough. OC Transpo and City Council<br />

Smart construction that allows maximum flow of traffic...open unused lanes on<br />

weekends/pm<br />

No concerns<br />

Tunnel is too deep and goes too far north<br />

Le plus tôt possible, SVP!<br />

Expense – distance below grade<br />

I prefer the Carling route to go west from Tunney’s Pasture<br />

Make sure that the bus system is functional through the entire construction process.<br />

You cannot shut down transit to downtown core<br />

Elle doit se faire avec minutie pour être solide et durable tout en se complétant le<br />

plus rapidement possible pour que la population commence à utiliser le service et les<br />

infrastructures aussi tôt que possible. Des matériaux et des respectueux de<br />

l’environnement doivent être utilisés dans toutes les étapes de processus<br />

Cost! Cost! Cost! This may end up costing much more. In a time of increasing<br />

deficits, how far can the Feds and provinces go in helping finance this system?<br />

Cleary tunneling is the preferred – dare we say the only option. Cut and cover won’t<br />

work, but how to control costs, and the duration of construction?<br />

On presume beaucoup<br />

Operation:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Unsafe environment – too much walking – too high a cost<br />

You said it was a study not a project!<br />

Again, how many jobs will it create, or will OC Transpo see a reduction. Will OC<br />

Transpo drivers have first option in operating LRT?<br />

No concerns<br />

Has enough money been allocated for operation and maintenance?<br />

L’esthetique des stations<br />

Keep a few trains 24 hrs, this system needs to be functional for all users, regardless<br />

of their working hours<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Elle doit commencer avec force es susciter la fierté. Elle ne doit pas se limiter, de<br />

quelque façon que ce soit, à des objectifs d’achalandage conservateurs ou peu<br />

ambitieux ainsi que s’astreindre à des critères de simple rentabilité ou, pire, de<br />

profitabilité à court ou à moyen terme. Elle doit au contraire convaincre et attirer<br />

sans cesse<br />

Hopefully automated systems will cut down on costs in the long run. LRT is more<br />

suited to some automation, I believe<br />

On croirait que vous aves “carte blanche”<br />

Je trouve 50 million tres élevée pour géner ce project – je prise déjà à des déponses<br />

non justifies qui vont surgir<br />

From Bernie Geiger:<br />

The whole project appears to be very expensive. The transitway was supposed to easily<br />

convertible. The costs shown for the conversion of the transitway surface parts are<br />

stupendously high. Q5. By tunneling from MacKenzie Bridge/Laurier through<br />

Campus to a portal at the Queensway adds kilometers to expensive tunnel and $100s<br />

> of millions to costs. (The $200 million Baseline Station disaster looks like a bargain<br />

in comparison).<br />

It will take far too many years to plan, design, tender, build, test and break-in. NS<br />

LRT build and test was about 2 years, this will be 2 to 3 times, once design and<br />

tendering is complete.<br />

The City of <strong>Ottawa</strong> does not have the proven track record to plan and successfully<br />

manage a project of this scope and complexity, it is very high risk.<br />

The benefits to users in the core (the primary target audience and problem area) is<br />

negative. They will need to walk further to the core stations, need to take 4 escalators<br />

to get to the platforms, will need to wait longer for a the next train to arrive than the 3<br />

buses per > minute now going along Albert/Slater. Total travel times will be longer<br />

and user experience will not be enhanced.<br />

Tourists, visitors and casual users will be disoriented by the many elevators and twists<br />

and turns they must take to get up and down to/from the stations. On arriving at<br />

street level, strangers will have no idea where they are. This is unlike surface transit<br />

and shallow subways.<br />

There are serious safety and security concerns arising from lost packages/bomb threats,<br />

noxious/poison gas releases, fire, collisions etc. Few people are accustomed and many<br />

are simply not capable of climbing 10 flights of stairs (the depth of the core stations) let<br />

alone in a crowded, stressful emergency environment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!