Minutes 15-12-10 - Shire of Shark Bay
Minutes 15-12-10 - Shire of Shark Bay
Minutes 15-12-10 - Shire of Shark Bay
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – <strong>15</strong> DECEMBER 20<strong>10</strong> 80<br />
a compromised speed <strong>of</strong> 4 Km’s per day was used in the calculations for costs. The <strong>Shire</strong><br />
grader was used in all costs for the grading portion <strong>of</strong> the contract and the <strong>Shire</strong> loader was<br />
used as the machine to do the clearing within the <strong>Shire</strong>’s price. I would not recommend placing<br />
the <strong>Shire</strong>s loader in this type <strong>of</strong> clearing as the risk <strong>of</strong> staking tyres is very high. If a tyre was to<br />
be staked then the cost <strong>of</strong> tyre replacement would out way any price saving gained by using<br />
<strong>Shire</strong> machinery to clear the vegetation along the new fence line. The <strong>Shire</strong>’s excavator was<br />
considered and even though it could do the work, its lack <strong>of</strong> speed whilst clearing increases its<br />
overall cost well beyond that <strong>of</strong> the other three prices. As can be seen, all the pricing is<br />
reasonably close but I emphasise that these are approximated costs but I don’t envisage that<br />
they will be far from actual costs.<br />
Contractor Northcoast Malibu <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Shark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong><br />
Machine D7 D8 Loader L70E<br />
Price $5,400 $6,300 $6,500<br />
Grading $4,490 $4,490 $4,490<br />
Mob $1,375 $1,375 $775<br />
Demob $1,375 $1,375 $775<br />
Accommodation/<br />
Meals<br />
$5<strong>10</strong> $5<strong>10</strong> $850<br />
Total $13,<strong>15</strong>0 $14,050 $13,390<br />
Comment<br />
As the committee is aware the implications associated with supporting a request <strong>of</strong><br />
this nature may set a precedent that has significant ongoing cost implications to the<br />
Council.<br />
The site inspection evidenced issues with the fence line <strong>of</strong> sections in the vicinity <strong>of</strong><br />
the road, however there are a number <strong>of</strong> contributing factors beyond the<br />
responsibility <strong>of</strong> the Council associated with the deterioration <strong>of</strong> the fence.<br />
The issue <strong>of</strong> a contribution towards the reconstruction <strong>of</strong> a fence line 50 metres north<br />
from the existing fence without significant benefit to the Council would be difficult to<br />
justify.<br />
The Butchers Track road way also veers away from the fence line and it would be<br />
proposed that the costs associated with the clearing <strong>of</strong> this section <strong>of</strong> the fence line<br />
be borne by Hamelin Station.<br />
There is an obligation on a property owner to establish and maintain an adequate<br />
boundary fence and that is adjacent to a public road way.<br />
The current state <strong>of</strong> the Hamelin Station boundary fence adjacent to the Butchers<br />
Track would be difficult to be described as a fence adequate for the purposes <strong>of</strong><br />
which it was originally constructed purpose.<br />
However there would be an advantage to the Council for the fence to be relocated.<br />
The relocation 50 metres to the north <strong>of</strong> the existing fence line adjacent to the<br />
roadway would provide a far greater area <strong>of</strong> road verge.<br />
This would provide sufficient room for the Council over time to shift the roadway to<br />
the north and alleviate the same situation occurring on the southern boundary fence.