19.04.2015 Views

Minutes 15-12-10 - Shire of Shark Bay

Minutes 15-12-10 - Shire of Shark Bay

Minutes 15-12-10 - Shire of Shark Bay

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES – <strong>15</strong> DECEMBER 20<strong>10</strong> 80<br />

a compromised speed <strong>of</strong> 4 Km’s per day was used in the calculations for costs. The <strong>Shire</strong><br />

grader was used in all costs for the grading portion <strong>of</strong> the contract and the <strong>Shire</strong> loader was<br />

used as the machine to do the clearing within the <strong>Shire</strong>’s price. I would not recommend placing<br />

the <strong>Shire</strong>s loader in this type <strong>of</strong> clearing as the risk <strong>of</strong> staking tyres is very high. If a tyre was to<br />

be staked then the cost <strong>of</strong> tyre replacement would out way any price saving gained by using<br />

<strong>Shire</strong> machinery to clear the vegetation along the new fence line. The <strong>Shire</strong>’s excavator was<br />

considered and even though it could do the work, its lack <strong>of</strong> speed whilst clearing increases its<br />

overall cost well beyond that <strong>of</strong> the other three prices. As can be seen, all the pricing is<br />

reasonably close but I emphasise that these are approximated costs but I don’t envisage that<br />

they will be far from actual costs.<br />

Contractor Northcoast Malibu <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Shark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong><br />

Machine D7 D8 Loader L70E<br />

Price $5,400 $6,300 $6,500<br />

Grading $4,490 $4,490 $4,490<br />

Mob $1,375 $1,375 $775<br />

Demob $1,375 $1,375 $775<br />

Accommodation/<br />

Meals<br />

$5<strong>10</strong> $5<strong>10</strong> $850<br />

Total $13,<strong>15</strong>0 $14,050 $13,390<br />

Comment<br />

As the committee is aware the implications associated with supporting a request <strong>of</strong><br />

this nature may set a precedent that has significant ongoing cost implications to the<br />

Council.<br />

The site inspection evidenced issues with the fence line <strong>of</strong> sections in the vicinity <strong>of</strong><br />

the road, however there are a number <strong>of</strong> contributing factors beyond the<br />

responsibility <strong>of</strong> the Council associated with the deterioration <strong>of</strong> the fence.<br />

The issue <strong>of</strong> a contribution towards the reconstruction <strong>of</strong> a fence line 50 metres north<br />

from the existing fence without significant benefit to the Council would be difficult to<br />

justify.<br />

The Butchers Track road way also veers away from the fence line and it would be<br />

proposed that the costs associated with the clearing <strong>of</strong> this section <strong>of</strong> the fence line<br />

be borne by Hamelin Station.<br />

There is an obligation on a property owner to establish and maintain an adequate<br />

boundary fence and that is adjacent to a public road way.<br />

The current state <strong>of</strong> the Hamelin Station boundary fence adjacent to the Butchers<br />

Track would be difficult to be described as a fence adequate for the purposes <strong>of</strong><br />

which it was originally constructed purpose.<br />

However there would be an advantage to the Council for the fence to be relocated.<br />

The relocation 50 metres to the north <strong>of</strong> the existing fence line adjacent to the<br />

roadway would provide a far greater area <strong>of</strong> road verge.<br />

This would provide sufficient room for the Council over time to shift the roadway to<br />

the north and alleviate the same situation occurring on the southern boundary fence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!