16.11.2012 Views

AMEE Berlin 2002 Programme

AMEE Berlin 2002 Programme

AMEE Berlin 2002 Programme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

were also asked whether they thought the objectives<br />

were relevant. The questionnaire was sent to all 743<br />

members who had been registered in 1999 (they had<br />

been working for approximately 3-4 years). More than<br />

90% replied to the questionnaire. This is the first time<br />

a survey including all doctors from all six universities<br />

Session 2L Multiprofessional education<br />

2L1 Interprofessional learning: the New<br />

Generation Project<br />

Debra Humphris* and Chris Stephens*<br />

The Department of Medical Education, Office of School of<br />

Medicine, University of Southampton, MP 801 Level C, South<br />

Academic Block, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton,<br />

SO16 6DY, UK<br />

At the University of Southampton the undergraduate<br />

BM course takes place within a multiprofessional<br />

Faculty of Medicine, Health and Biological Sciences,<br />

which includes the School of Nursing and Midwifery,<br />

the School of Health Professions and Rehabilitation<br />

Sciences and the School of Biological Sciences. The<br />

rich mix of professional programmes within the Faculty<br />

has led over the past decade to numerous developments<br />

in interprofessional learning and practice. The Faculty’s<br />

commitment to building on its experience of<br />

interprofessional learning is reflected in its strategic<br />

plan, and the establishment of the New Generation<br />

Project. This bold project will enable the Faculty to<br />

demonstrate its contribution to the modernisation of<br />

education and training for the health and social care<br />

workforce. The process of these changes within a large<br />

educational organisation will be explored and<br />

discussed.<br />

2L2 “Walking in the moccasins of<br />

others”: reflections on a new<br />

initiative to bring the real world of the<br />

patient into the medical curriculum<br />

Lyn Brown<br />

University of Liverpool, Community Studies Unit, Department<br />

of Primary Care, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill,<br />

Liverpool L59 3GB, UK<br />

Community Placements are an essential feature of the<br />

Liverpool University Undergraduate Medical<br />

Curriculum. They are designed to give students contact<br />

with all aspects of health and medicine outside the<br />

immediate confines of hospital and general practice.<br />

During second year, placement in community health<br />

services, statutory and voluntary social work agencies,<br />

and supervised University based groups, provide<br />

excellent learning opportunities that complement other<br />

aspects of the students’ learning. Without diminishing<br />

the bio-medical approach to health-care, placements<br />

enhance the students’ learning by developing a broader<br />

view of health and disease that includes psychological<br />

and socio-economic factors. This would seem to offer<br />

students wider options in management of ill-health and<br />

disability; effecting involvement with, and better long<br />

term care of, their patients. This paper describes the<br />

methods, evaluations and outcomes set in place to<br />

achieve the above.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.20 -<br />

has been carried out. The survey is intended to be<br />

carried out annually, thus providing a series of results<br />

at national level, as well as an impact assessment of<br />

the new curricula which are being implemented in<br />

Swedish medical schools. The results will be presented<br />

at the conference.<br />

2L3 Multiprofessional education in<br />

health care ethics in Germany<br />

Jochen Vollmann<br />

Freie Universitat <strong>Berlin</strong>, Arbeitsgruppe Ethik in der Medizin,<br />

Institut fur Geschichte der Medizin, Klingsorstr. 119, D-12203<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

In Germany only very limited practical experience and<br />

knowledge in teaching of medical ethics and ethics of<br />

health care is available. German medical schools do<br />

not offer regular ethics teaching, whereas the<br />

“Reformstudiengang Medizin” at the Charité in <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

provides some teaching blocks in medical ethics.<br />

Graduate ethics training in nursing sciences, public<br />

health and social work varies widely. Since 1995 the<br />

author teaches ethics to medical students as well as<br />

students in public health, nursing and social work at<br />

various universities in <strong>Berlin</strong> and the U.S. In this short<br />

communication preliminary data from a 5 year pilot<br />

study are presented. Different demands, approaches and<br />

evaluation results of ethics teaching in the different<br />

professional graduate courses are presented. Pro and<br />

cons of ethics teaching in the various professional<br />

programs are compared with the multiprofessional<br />

approaches in the <strong>Berlin</strong> program of public health and<br />

at the Evangelische Fachhochschule <strong>Berlin</strong>.<br />

2L4 Dilemmas in resuscitation: nursing<br />

and medical students’ responses to<br />

ethical professional issues related<br />

to resuscitation of patients<br />

C Edward*, J Crosby and P E Preece*<br />

University of Dundee, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tayside<br />

Campus, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee<br />

DD1 9SY, UK<br />

At the University of Dundee a three hour teaching<br />

session involving 280+ nursing and medical students<br />

took place in 1999. The aim was to enable the students<br />

to explore and debate, together, the ethical/professional<br />

issues inherent within resuscitation. An automated<br />

audience response test containing 5 set questions was<br />

given to the students immediately pre/post the session.<br />

Two significantly different responses were related to:<br />

• Who should have the major say in advanced<br />

decisions of resuscitation? (Doctor, Nurse, Patient,<br />

Relatives, Team). Team-Pre: Nursing 66% Medical<br />

78%. Post: Nursing 97% Medical 89%.<br />

• Should close relatives be permitted to witness<br />

resuscitation? Permit-Pre: Nursing 63% Medical<br />

12%; Post: Nursing 55% (still permit) Medical 29%<br />

(now in favour).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!