16.11.2012 Views

AMEE Berlin 2002 Programme

AMEE Berlin 2002 Programme

AMEE Berlin 2002 Programme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2E6 Teaching the forgotten tribe: tutor<br />

views on a generic curriculum<br />

for SHOs<br />

Lesley Pugsley* and Janet MacDonald<br />

School of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, Academic<br />

Department of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education,<br />

University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff,<br />

CF4 4XN, UK<br />

A consortium of postgraduate centres has developed<br />

as a pilot, a generic programme for the SHOs in South<br />

East Wales. It is designed to run for an initial eight<br />

week period commencing in the Spring of this year,<br />

with an evaluation in July and a report on the<br />

programme in August 2001. The core curriculum has<br />

been resource led, its design predicated on the various<br />

skills and topics which individual consortium members<br />

felt able to contribute. This paper complements the<br />

initial phase of a research study which focused on the<br />

perceived needs of SHOs and VTS and takes as its focus<br />

the core tutor team. It seeks to identify emergent themes<br />

of congruence and dissonance between the groups of<br />

learners and teachers in order to assist in the<br />

identification of a compatible curriculum addressing<br />

the perceived needs of the SHO grade within the<br />

limitations of resources and service commitments.<br />

Session 2F Peer assessment<br />

2F1 Peer- and co-assessment leads to<br />

shared responsibility for test results<br />

Caro Brumsen and Peter G M de Jong*<br />

Leiden University Medical Center LUMC, Onderwijscentrum<br />

IG, Kamer C5-54, P O Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

During the clerkship in Internal Medicine, an<br />

introductory test is taken every 3 weeks by a group of<br />

10 students. A pool of correctors corrects the test.<br />

Usually there is a lot of discussion concerning the test<br />

results. Therefore a new correction procedure was<br />

introduced. In duos, students do the first correction on<br />

copied versions of the test, with the aid of a standard<br />

answer sheet. Discussion is encouraged and students<br />

can put down their comment in writing, preferably with<br />

references added. This comment is sent to the second<br />

corrector together with the original version of the test<br />

answers. On evaluation, most of the students<br />

commented positively, especially on the possibility to<br />

gain insight into the correct answers. The method of<br />

peer- and co-assessment appears to have led to an<br />

improved acceptance of test results, reflected by a<br />

dramatic decrease in complaints.<br />

2F2 Student self-marking as an<br />

assessment approach to<br />

developing professionalism<br />

G J Mires* and M Friedman Ben-David<br />

University of Dundee, Department of Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee<br />

DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.10 -<br />

2E7 General professional training (GPT)<br />

for dental graduates in the UK<br />

Alison Bullock*, Vickie Firmstone and John Frame<br />

Centre for Research in Medical & Dental Education, School of<br />

Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

This presentation reports on GPT in UK dentistry.<br />

Comparison is made with senior house officer training<br />

for medical graduates which is currently under review<br />

in the UK. The study gained information on the GPT<br />

undertaken by recent graduates in dentistry and their<br />

views on it. A questionnaire was sent to those registered<br />

(since 1997) for Membership of the Faculty of Dental<br />

Surgery (MFDS) Distance Learning Course (Royal<br />

College of Surgeons of England). A 55% (n=342)<br />

response rate was achieved. Widespread support was<br />

found amongst trainees for a period of GPT. However<br />

there was consensus that this period should be<br />

voluntary. There was support for both formal, integrated<br />

2-year programmes and self-constructed versions that<br />

can offer greater flexibility. A qualification marking<br />

the successful completion of GPT was favoured. GPT<br />

that provides experience of primary and secondary care<br />

forms a broad basis for future careers.<br />

Dundee University Medical School has adopted an<br />

outcome-based curriculum in which personal<br />

development is one of the defined outcomes. Selflearning<br />

and self-awareness are important attributes of<br />

this outcome. A study was undertaken to evaluate the<br />

feasibility and reliability and to survey student opinion<br />

regarding the value of undergraduate medical student<br />

self-marking of written examinations as a means of<br />

developing these attributes. The correlation between<br />

student and staff marks, and the reliability of marking<br />

was high. The majority of students considered there<br />

was value in the exercise as a learning and feedback<br />

opportunity, but found it stressful. We believe that this<br />

approach, as well as being reliable, provides a powerful<br />

feedback and self-learning opportunity. It also provides<br />

a mechanism to identify individuals who over or under<br />

mark or who feel threatened by feedback or are unable<br />

to receive negative feedback, with whom Faculty can<br />

work.<br />

2F3 Comprehensive assessment: value<br />

for learning<br />

Elaine F Dannefer<br />

University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue,<br />

Box 601, Rochester NY 14642, USA<br />

The University of Rochester School of Medicine and<br />

Dentistry has implemented a two-week long<br />

comprehensive assessment of second year medical<br />

students for purposes of providing formative feedback.<br />

Multiple assessment techniques, including standardized<br />

clinical encounters and peer assessments, provide

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!