24.04.2015 Views

Final FONSI and EA for hot cargo pad on Kirtland AFB - Kirtland Air ...

Final FONSI and EA for hot cargo pad on Kirtland AFB - Kirtland Air ...

Final FONSI and EA for hot cargo pad on Kirtland AFB - Kirtland Air ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cultural Resources<br />

The American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Amendments of 1994 recognize that freedom<br />

of religi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> all people is an inherent right, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> traditi<strong>on</strong>al American Indian religi<strong>on</strong>s are an<br />

indispensable <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> irreplaceable part of Indian life. It also recognized the lack of Federal policy <strong>on</strong> this<br />

issue <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> made it the policy of the United States to protect <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> preserve the inherent right of religious<br />

freedom <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> Native Americans. The 1994 Amendments provide clear legal protecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> the religious<br />

use of peyote cactus as a religious sacrament. Federal agencies are resp<strong>on</strong>sible <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> evaluating their<br />

acti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> policies to determine if changes should be made to protect <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> preserve the religious cultural<br />

rights <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> practices of Native Americans. These evaluati<strong>on</strong>s must be made in c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong> with native<br />

traditi<strong>on</strong>al religious leaders.<br />

The Archaeological Resource Protecti<strong>on</strong> Act (ARPA) of 1979 protects archaeological resources <strong>on</strong> public<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> American Indian l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. It provides fel<strong>on</strong>y-level penalties <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> the unauthorized excavati<strong>on</strong>, removal,<br />

damage, alterati<strong>on</strong>, or defacement of any archaeological resource, defined as material remains of past<br />

human life or activities which are at least 100 years old. Be<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>e archaeological resources are excavated or<br />

removed from public l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s, the Federal l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> manager must issue a permit detailing the time, scope,<br />

locati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> specific purpose of the proposed work. ARPA also fosters the exchange of in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong><br />

about archaeological resources between governmental agencies, the professi<strong>on</strong>al archaeological<br />

community, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> private individuals. ARPA is implemented by regulati<strong>on</strong>s found in 43 CFR Part 7.<br />

The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Historic Preservati<strong>on</strong> Act (NHPA) of 1966 sets <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>th nati<strong>on</strong>al policy to identify <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> preserve<br />

properties of state, local, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al significance. The NHPA establishes the Advisory Council <strong>on</strong><br />

Historic Preservati<strong>on</strong> (ACHP), State Historic Preservati<strong>on</strong> Officers (SHPOs), <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Register of<br />

Historic Places (NRHP). ACHP advises the President, C<strong>on</strong>gress, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Federal agencies <strong>on</strong> historic<br />

preservati<strong>on</strong> issues. Secti<strong>on</strong> 106 of the NHPA directs Federal agencies to take into account effects of<br />

their undertakings (acti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> authorizati<strong>on</strong>s) <strong>on</strong> properties included in or eligible <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> the NRHP.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 110 sets inventory, nominati<strong>on</strong>, protecti<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> preservati<strong>on</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> federally owned<br />

cultural properties. Secti<strong>on</strong> 106 of the act is implemented by regulati<strong>on</strong>s of the ACHP, 36 CFR Part 800.<br />

Agencies should coordinate studies <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> documents prepared under Secti<strong>on</strong> 106 with NEPA where<br />

appropriate. However, NEPA <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> NHPA are separate statutes <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> compliance with <strong>on</strong>e does not<br />

c<strong>on</strong>stitute compliance with the other. For example, acti<strong>on</strong>s which qualify <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> a categorical exclusi<strong>on</strong><br />

under NEPA might still require Secti<strong>on</strong> 106 review under NHPA. It is the resp<strong>on</strong>sibility of the agency<br />

official to identify properties in the area of potential effects, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> whether they are included or eligible <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

inclusi<strong>on</strong> in the NRHP. Secti<strong>on</strong> 110 of the NHPA requires Federal agencies to identify, evaluate, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

nominate historic property under agency c<strong>on</strong>trol to the NRHP.<br />

The Native American Graves Protecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Repatriati<strong>on</strong> Act of 1990 establishes rights of American<br />

Indian tribes to claim ownership of certain “cultural items,” defined as Native American human remains,<br />

funerary objects, sacred objects, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> objects of cultural patrim<strong>on</strong>y, held or c<strong>on</strong>trolled by Federal agencies.<br />

Cultural items discovered <strong>on</strong> Federal or tribal l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s are, in order of primacy, the property of lineal<br />

descendants, if these can be determined, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> then the tribe owning the l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> where the items were<br />

discovered or the tribe with the closest cultural affiliati<strong>on</strong> with the items. Discoveries of cultural items <strong>on</strong><br />

Federal or tribal l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> must be reported to the appropriate American Indian tribe <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Federal agency<br />

with jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> over the l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>. If the discovery is made as a result of a l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> use, activity in the area must<br />

stop <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the items must be protected pending the outcome of c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong> with the affiliated tribe.<br />

EO 11593, Protecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Enhancement of the Cultural Envir<strong>on</strong>ment (May 13, 1971), directs the Federal<br />

government to provide leadership in the preservati<strong>on</strong>, restorati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> maintenance of the historic <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

cultural envir<strong>on</strong>ment. Federal agencies are required to locate <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> evaluate all Federal sites under their<br />

jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> or c<strong>on</strong>trol which might qualify <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> listing <strong>on</strong> the NRHP. Agencies must allow the ACHP to<br />

A-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!