Final FONSI and EA for hot cargo pad on Kirtland AFB - Kirtland Air ...
Final FONSI and EA for hot cargo pad on Kirtland AFB - Kirtland Air ...
Final FONSI and EA for hot cargo pad on Kirtland AFB - Kirtland Air ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Final</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>EA</str<strong>on</strong>g> Addressing C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, Operati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Maintenance of a Hot Cargo Pad<br />
The area disturbed would overlap with soil vapor m<strong>on</strong>itoring well (MW) K<strong>AFB</strong>-2604, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> could also<br />
affect MW K<strong>AFB</strong>-2606. In additi<strong>on</strong>, the c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> would overlap with groundwater MW K<strong>AFB</strong>-2622<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> MW K<strong>AFB</strong>-2602A (K<strong>AFB</strong> 2008e). These <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> other MWs around the periphery of the Proposed<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong> footprint are L<strong>on</strong>g Term M<strong>on</strong>itoring (LTM) wells <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>on</strong>itoring soil vapor <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> groundwater<br />
comp<strong>on</strong>ents of the WP-26. Presently, WP-26 is in the remedial investigati<strong>on</strong> phase. During the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> of the proposed <str<strong>on</strong>g>hot</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>cargo</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>pad</str<strong>on</strong>g>, BMPs should be followed to avoid damage to the existing<br />
MWs. Additi<strong>on</strong>al MWs may need to be installed in the future. These MWs would require c<strong>on</strong>tinued use,<br />
which could also require surface modificati<strong>on</strong> (i.e., modificati<strong>on</strong> to flush-covering).<br />
The NMED c<strong>on</strong>curs that the removal of the surface sewage sludge would alleviate any potential adverse<br />
effects <strong>on</strong> the envir<strong>on</strong>ment <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> human health from soil c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> (Bitner 2009). Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, the<br />
Proposed Acti<strong>on</strong> includes setting the existing MWs flush with the paving of the proposed <str<strong>on</strong>g>hot</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>cargo</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>pad</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />
This would allow <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> the c<strong>on</strong>tinued use of the MWs to aid in the remediati<strong>on</strong> of the soil vapor <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> ground<br />
water c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>on</strong>ce appropriate remedial acti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> these areas are selected. C<strong>on</strong>sequently,<br />
c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> activities at Kirtl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>AFB</strong> would result in impacts <strong>on</strong> the ERP site; however, these impacts<br />
would be expected to be less than significant.<br />
No significant impacts <strong>on</strong> ERP site WP-26 would be expected from the operati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> maintenance of the<br />
proposed <str<strong>on</strong>g>hot</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>cargo</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>pad</str<strong>on</strong>g>. While a remedial acti<strong>on</strong> has not been selected <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> the soil vapor <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> perched<br />
groundwater c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> identified in the RFI, the samples with the highest identified levels of<br />
c<strong>on</strong>taminants were at the perched groundwater interface at approximately 200 feet bgs (K<strong>AFB</strong> 2008e). It<br />
is likely that the approved remedial acti<strong>on</strong> will require periodic access to the area <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> collecti<strong>on</strong> of media<br />
samples from the MWs. In additi<strong>on</strong>, because the final remedial abatement has not been selected,<br />
additi<strong>on</strong>al surface equipment, such as soil vapor extracti<strong>on</strong> blowers/piping, might need to be installed.<br />
While it is anticipated that interference with the proposed <str<strong>on</strong>g>hot</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>cargo</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>pad</str<strong>on</strong>g> would be minimal <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> required<br />
equipment installati<strong>on</strong> would be designed to operate from remote locati<strong>on</strong>s, some overlap might occur.<br />
No significant impacts associated with the four MMRP sites would be expected during c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> or<br />
operati<strong>on</strong>al activities under the Proposed Acti<strong>on</strong>. Use of the four historic ranges identified in the Kirtl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<strong>AFB</strong> MMRP that overlap with the proposed <str<strong>on</strong>g>hot</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>cargo</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>pad</str<strong>on</strong>g> site was disc<strong>on</strong>tinued prior to 1962, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
Proposed Acti<strong>on</strong> area has underg<strong>on</strong>e significant alterati<strong>on</strong> in the intervening years. It is unlikely that<br />
quantities of MC <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> MECs, if any, would be encountered during c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Asbestos-C<strong>on</strong>taining Material. The c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, operati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> maintenance of the proposed <str<strong>on</strong>g>hot</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>cargo</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>pad</str<strong>on</strong>g> would not involve the h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ling of ACMs; there<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>e, the Proposed Acti<strong>on</strong> would not result in any<br />
impacts related to ACMs.<br />
Lead-Based Paint. The c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, operati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> maintenance of the proposed <str<strong>on</strong>g>hot</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>cargo</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>pad</str<strong>on</strong>g> would<br />
not involve the use of LBP; there<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>e, the Proposed Acti<strong>on</strong> would not result in any impacts related to<br />
LBP.<br />
Polychlorinated Biphenyls. The c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, operati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> maintenance of the proposed <str<strong>on</strong>g>hot</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>cargo</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>pad</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
would not involve the h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ling of materials c<strong>on</strong>taining PCBs; there<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>e, the Proposed Acti<strong>on</strong> would not<br />
result in any impacts related to PCBs.<br />
Polluti<strong>on</strong> Preventi<strong>on</strong>. Less-than-significant impacts <strong>on</strong> the Polluti<strong>on</strong> Preventi<strong>on</strong> Program at Kirtl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<strong>AFB</strong> would be expected from implementati<strong>on</strong> of the Proposed Acti<strong>on</strong>. An incremental increase in<br />
hazardous materials <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> wastes would be expected during c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> operati<strong>on</strong> under the Proposed<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong>. Adherence to the Polluti<strong>on</strong> Preventi<strong>on</strong> Program <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> associated plans at Kirtl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>AFB</strong>, in<br />
particular the Hazardous Material Emergency Planning <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Resp<strong>on</strong>se Plan, would reduce adverse impacts<br />
Kirtl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>AFB</strong>, NM January 2011<br />
4-18