14.05.2015 Views

Untitled - Council for British Archaeology

Untitled - Council for British Archaeology

Untitled - Council for British Archaeology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RECOMNENDATIONS<br />

Apart from the church, Bloxham possesses few individual buildings<br />

of outstanding architectural quality. Nonetheless its range of<br />

vernacular buildings is of very great interest,,and the many attractive<br />

groupings of old houses and cottages using local materials on sloping<br />

sites within a pattern of lanes itself of considerable historic interest<br />

combine to make Bloxham visually a most attractive and interesting<br />

settlement.<br />

It is clearly a village under great pressure through its proximity<br />

to Banbury. There has been extensive new building to the W. and<br />

smaller new developments to the NE., S. and SW., together with a<br />

limited amount of infill within the old village itself. On the whole<br />

the latter has been reasonably unobtrusive. Given the need to<br />

concentrate expansion in certain rural settlements, Bloxham,<br />

with its tradition as an 'open' village, has been able to absorb the<br />

pressure better than many, and can probably continue to do so without<br />

serious risk of damage to its historic core. The designation of the<br />

Conservation Area should ensure that any further redevelopment within<br />

the old village should not detract from its present attractive<br />

appearance. When the Department of Museum Services was invited to<br />

comment on the proposed designation in 1975, the boundary of the<br />

area was felt to be satisfactory, and no extensions have needed to be<br />

recomnended.<br />

There are no archaeological sites within or close to the village<br />

which are felt to be of sufficient value to warrant scheduling. On<br />

the other hand, the grading of Listed Buildings may well now, warrant<br />

revision. A couple.(PRN's 11,792 and 11,769) have now been demolished.<br />

Although a detailed survey has not been possible here, it is suspected<br />

that most of those cm the Supplementary List and several not listed<br />

at all could well be upgraded to Grade II status.<br />

The greatest pressure <strong>for</strong> further development will no doubt continue<br />

to be at the margins of the settlement. At present there are no known<br />

archaeological sites within the village or close to its periphery of<br />

such.outstanding importance as to.warrant permanent preservation or<br />

large-scale excavation; it has there<strong>for</strong>e not been felt necessary to<br />

indicate any areas of archaeological interest around Bloxham<br />

on the historical constraint maps provided to the District <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

While the need <strong>for</strong> archaeological éxcavation is not felt to be a<br />

major priority, the following problems might repay investigation should<br />

opportunity arise at a.time when resources are available:-<br />

The extent of the Romano-<strong>British</strong> settlement on the Tadmarton<br />

road (PRN. 1712/4984)<br />

The extent and nature of the Romano-<strong>British</strong> settlement N. of the<br />

village (PRN. 9948)<br />

The sites of the dwellings, outbuildings and precincts of<br />

either of the two medieval manor-houses (PRN's 11,122 and 11,773)<br />

7 121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!