Untitled - Council for British Archaeology
Untitled - Council for British Archaeology
Untitled - Council for British Archaeology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
RECOMNENDATIONS<br />
Apart from the church, Bloxham possesses few individual buildings<br />
of outstanding architectural quality. Nonetheless its range of<br />
vernacular buildings is of very great interest,,and the many attractive<br />
groupings of old houses and cottages using local materials on sloping<br />
sites within a pattern of lanes itself of considerable historic interest<br />
combine to make Bloxham visually a most attractive and interesting<br />
settlement.<br />
It is clearly a village under great pressure through its proximity<br />
to Banbury. There has been extensive new building to the W. and<br />
smaller new developments to the NE., S. and SW., together with a<br />
limited amount of infill within the old village itself. On the whole<br />
the latter has been reasonably unobtrusive. Given the need to<br />
concentrate expansion in certain rural settlements, Bloxham,<br />
with its tradition as an 'open' village, has been able to absorb the<br />
pressure better than many, and can probably continue to do so without<br />
serious risk of damage to its historic core. The designation of the<br />
Conservation Area should ensure that any further redevelopment within<br />
the old village should not detract from its present attractive<br />
appearance. When the Department of Museum Services was invited to<br />
comment on the proposed designation in 1975, the boundary of the<br />
area was felt to be satisfactory, and no extensions have needed to be<br />
recomnended.<br />
There are no archaeological sites within or close to the village<br />
which are felt to be of sufficient value to warrant scheduling. On<br />
the other hand, the grading of Listed Buildings may well now, warrant<br />
revision. A couple.(PRN's 11,792 and 11,769) have now been demolished.<br />
Although a detailed survey has not been possible here, it is suspected<br />
that most of those cm the Supplementary List and several not listed<br />
at all could well be upgraded to Grade II status.<br />
The greatest pressure <strong>for</strong> further development will no doubt continue<br />
to be at the margins of the settlement. At present there are no known<br />
archaeological sites within the village or close to its periphery of<br />
such.outstanding importance as to.warrant permanent preservation or<br />
large-scale excavation; it has there<strong>for</strong>e not been felt necessary to<br />
indicate any areas of archaeological interest around Bloxham<br />
on the historical constraint maps provided to the District <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
While the need <strong>for</strong> archaeological éxcavation is not felt to be a<br />
major priority, the following problems might repay investigation should<br />
opportunity arise at a.time when resources are available:-<br />
The extent of the Romano-<strong>British</strong> settlement on the Tadmarton<br />
road (PRN. 1712/4984)<br />
The extent and nature of the Romano-<strong>British</strong> settlement N. of the<br />
village (PRN. 9948)<br />
The sites of the dwellings, outbuildings and precincts of<br />
either of the two medieval manor-houses (PRN's 11,122 and 11,773)<br />
7 121