14.05.2015 Views

Untitled - Council for British Archaeology

Untitled - Council for British Archaeology

Untitled - Council for British Archaeology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ian Meadows by local volunteers in the garden (Fig. 49) on the eastern<br />

side of Moat Cottage. Many of the trial holes revealed a limestone<br />

rubble spread across the eastern half of the garden, but this gave<br />

way towards the cottage to much deeper stratification which at a<br />

depth of approximately 1.2 m revealed two Medieval coursed rubble<br />

wall foundations and associated gravelly clay floors which provided<br />

only mid-Medieval pottery. It is now clear that it is beneath<br />

the western half of the garden east of Moat Cottage that substantial<br />

Medieval buildings lie, sealed by dumped soil.<br />

To the east of the present cottage the moat was clearly<br />

re-shaped during the laying-out of the 18th century walled garden.<br />

A large 2 m deep trench A against the north wall showed a substantial,<br />

heavily silted ditch, wmter logged at the bottom. The ditch silts<br />

produced domestic pottery from the early Post-Medieval period. The<br />

section showed that the ditch had been purposely filled in. A<br />

mechanically dug trench at B exposed the edge of a deep, silted ditch<br />

which is possibly the other edge of the ditch found in trench A.<br />

Two similar trenches at E and F confirmed the existence of the<br />

moat and the pond as shown on the enclosure award, both of which<br />

were apparently constructed during the mid Post-Medieval landscaping.<br />

Both were filled by 19th and 20th century débris.<br />

Several problems remain to be solved. It is now clear that the<br />

whole shape of the present landscape is the result of 18th century<br />

replanning. That there was a moat in the Medieval period seems<br />

likely but the evidence is ,not conclusive. The moat exposed in<br />

trench A was silting up during the later 16th - earlier 17th century<br />

and this may have been a Medieval moat that had been previously<br />

cleaned out. Whatever its date it does not adhere to the present<br />

day rectangular plan. The original shape of the moat remains to be<br />

discovered and also to see whether it connects with the two fishponds<br />

to the south, fishponds which may be dated in the light of our<br />

present,limited knowledge to the end of the Medieval or early Post-<br />

Medieval period. A machine trench C across the fishponds did not<br />

provide any dating evidence. A further trench D showed that a<br />

suggested third fishpond did not exist.<br />

More work clearly remains to be done at Moat Cottage to assess<br />

the nature and extent of what from material evidence must have been<br />

a Medieval manor house, the nature of further work depends on<br />

whether the housing development will provide sufficient opportunity<br />

to observe the archaeology. If necessary, some further excavation<br />

may be required to examine an area to the north of the walled garden<br />

where the présence of two completely buried north-south ditches<br />

have been revealed by geophysical survey.<br />

38. IFFLEY,. The Rectory - Brian Durham<br />

A careful restoration is being carried out by the Landmark<br />

Trust, who kindly allowed some excavation in the north block to<br />

- 179-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!