Untitled - Council for British Archaeology
Untitled - Council for British Archaeology
Untitled - Council for British Archaeology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE OXFORDSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL UNIT 1979 -<br />
Tom Hassell, Director<br />
In spite of the gloomy outlooklor the <strong>British</strong> economy 1979<br />
witnessed a small building boom in Ox<strong>for</strong>dshire and in particular<br />
Ox<strong>for</strong>d itself. Many construction projects Which had been discussed<br />
<strong>for</strong> a long time began to actually take'shape. Accordingly the number<br />
of rescue excavations either carried out by the Unit itself or in<br />
cooperation with local societies and individuals has had to match the<br />
work-load.<br />
For the first half of the year the scale of operations was somewhat<br />
less than in the previous year. The reason <strong>for</strong> this reduction<br />
was that the Manpower Services Commission's Job Creation Programme<br />
project came to an end in December 1978, nor was there a suitable<br />
site <strong>for</strong> a major summer excavation using volunteers. However, the<br />
MSC approved a new scheme under the Special Temporary Employment<br />
Programme half-way through the year and since July up to 15 STEP<br />
employees have been employed by the Unit. This labour <strong>for</strong>ce will<br />
continue until July 1980. This further MSC grant has enabled the<br />
high level of excavation activity of the Unit to continue while<br />
allowing the Unit to liberate its resources to begin to catch up on<br />
outstanding post-excavation projects. After July 1980 the work-load<br />
is again bound to decline as costs continue to rise.<br />
The financial position of the Unit since its first full year of<br />
operations is summarised in Fig34. Fromthis diagram the financial<br />
trends of the first five years show very clearly. Expenditure has<br />
risen dramatically largely because of inflation which particularly<br />
affects the salaries element of the Unit's budget. In addition the<br />
growth of this element is compounded by the young age of all the staff<br />
who are on incremental salary scales. The graph also shows the dramatic<br />
effect of the various MSC schemes on the overall expenditure. Noteworthy<br />
also is the virtually static size of the Department of the<br />
Environment's (DoE) grant to Ox<strong>for</strong>dshire. In real terms there has<br />
been a major annual cut-back which has only been partly offset by DoE<br />
grants <strong>for</strong> projects outside Ox<strong>for</strong>dshire.<br />
The Unit's projects currently fall into three distinct categories<br />
so far as funding is concerned:<br />
Major projects considered by the DoE to be of national importance<br />
either in Ox<strong>for</strong>dshire or in surrounding counties (Warwickshire and<br />
Gloucestershire in 1979). As mentioned above, during recent years the<br />
DoE grant <strong>for</strong> Ox<strong>for</strong>dshire has declined dramatically in real terms.<br />
The DoE grant alone is also insufficient to finance these projects in<br />
their entirety.<br />
Larger projects of county-wide significance using finance raised<br />
from MSC and other local sources such as the Local Authorities and the<br />
Amey Roadstone Corporation. Often the importance of these projects<br />
has been subsequently recognised by DoE.<br />
- 135-