Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington
Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington
Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Condit</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> Hydroelectric Project<br />
Final Supplemental EIS<br />
Post-<strong>Removal</strong> Management<br />
Upstream Sediment Management<br />
Unstable slopes, high angles of repose, and lateral channel migration until the river and its<br />
tributaries downcut to their original bedrock channels would create temporary pulses of<br />
suspended sediments that can have physiological and behavioral impacts to fish that can<br />
result in injuries, stress, reduced foraging efficiency, increased predation rates, etc. (Bash et<br />
al. 2001).<br />
Coarse sediment and large woody debris released during dam removal may create debris<br />
dams that create fish passage issues. The banks of the channel created by the river downcutting<br />
through lakebed sediments are likely to be deep and have a very steep angle of<br />
repose. Deep drawdowns for dam maintenance operations on dams in the Boise River<br />
watershed of Idaho created extensive flats of mud and sand through which the river downcut,<br />
creating steep banks that slough continually as the river migrated laterally (Salow 2004).<br />
Bank sloughs can have lethal consequences for fish as radio tagging studies have shown.<br />
During a study by Salow (2004) stationary tags often had to be dug out of a bank slough<br />
along with the tagged fish that was buried during the collapse of the streambank (Salow<br />
2004). This could be a problem for returning fish, especially during the first year after<br />
breaching the dam.<br />
Blasting to stabilize slopes or remove debris jams during the migration of winter- and<br />
summer-run steelhead in the spring and summer following dam breaching would expose<br />
steelhead to hydrostatic shock, and some fish mortalities are likely to occur in proximity to<br />
blasts.<br />
Any fish occupying lacustrine habitat at the time of dam removal would probably be flushed<br />
through the tunnel and downstream to the Bonneville pool. Many will be killed by high<br />
concentrations of suspended solids suffocating them or direct physical injury, but those that<br />
survive the trip down to the Bonneville pool would probably resume a lacustrine or<br />
lacustrine-adfluvial life history in the pool.<br />
Downstream Sediment Management<br />
Immediately after breaching of the reservoir, sediment would be deposited in the floodplain<br />
areas at progressively lower levels as the river flow subsides. This sediment would be<br />
transported downstream during natural storm and flood events. Woody debris trapped<br />
behind the dam would be washed downstream and accumulate at various points along the<br />
river, creating log-jams. If woody debris in the river does not interfere with downstream<br />
transport of large quantities of bedload or normal development of streambanks, it would help<br />
to store gravel in the river channel to eventually be used as spawning gravel. If blasting is<br />
required to redistribute large woody debris, any fish in the proximity of blasts would likely<br />
be killed by hydrostatic shock. Attempts to scare fish away from blasting are unlikely to be<br />
successful unless some form of chemical can be used as a repellent (perhaps the scent of a<br />
predator).<br />
4.3-25