09.06.2015 Views

Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington

Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington

Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Condit</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> Hydroelectric Project<br />

Final Supplemental EIS<br />

with limits on upstream juvenile migration, have combined to limit the population density of bull<br />

trout below a threshold of detectability by any practicable level of surveying.<br />

Nonsalmonid fish<br />

Three species of nonsalmonid fish that are likely to occur in the Bonneville Pool, and potentially<br />

in the lower White Salmon River below <strong>Condit</strong> <strong>Dam</strong>, were not documented in the 1996 FEIS<br />

(FERC 1996) or 2002 FSFEIS (FERC 2002) for the <strong>Condit</strong> Hydroelectric Project. These are the<br />

leopard dace (Rhinichthys falcatus), mountain sucker (Catostomus platyrhynchus), and river<br />

lamprey (Lampetra ayresi). All three of these species are <strong>Washington</strong> state Candidate species.<br />

If these species occur in the White Salmon River, they most likely are found in the large pool at<br />

the in-lieu site.<br />

Three species of nonsalmonid fish, longnose dace, western brook lamprey, and shorthead sculpin<br />

have been documented to occur in the White Salmon River above <strong>Condit</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> (Allen et al.<br />

2003).<br />

Section 3 Freshwater Mussels<br />

California Floater (Anodonta californiensis)<br />

The California floater is a <strong>Washington</strong> state Candidate Species. In the Draft White Salmon River<br />

Subbasin Summary prepared for the Northwest Power Planning Council by the WDFW, Dan<br />

Rawding (2000) states, “Freshwater mussels are known to inhabit certain portions of the basin;<br />

however, the current species assemblages, distribution, and status are unknown.” A large<br />

population of freshwater mussels is known to exist in Rattlesnake and Indian creeks (Parker<br />

2005). The priority species status review by the WDFW documents their presence in the<br />

Columbia River about 20 miles upstream from the mouth of the White Salmon River. This is the<br />

closest known survey for benthic invertebrates to the project area. Molly Hallock, a WDFW<br />

biologist, stated in a phone conversation that she was unaware of any mollusk surveys that have<br />

been conducted by WDFW or USFWS in the White Salmon River Basin (Hallock 2005).<br />

Terrence Frest, one of the malacologists most familiar with Columbia Basin mollusks, stated that<br />

he wasn’t aware of any surveys conducted in this portion of the Bonneville Pool. He also<br />

acknowledged that suitable habitat was likely present, that the project site was within the historic<br />

range of the species, and that a survey would be required to document its absence from the site<br />

(Frest 2003, 2004).<br />

The lower reaches of the White Salmon River and Columbia River in the vicinity of the project<br />

contains suitable historic habitat for California floaters. Management Recommendations for<br />

<strong>Washington</strong> State priority invertebrate species (Larsen et al. 1995) state that baseline surveys are<br />

required to adequately monitor, manage, and mitigate for losses of the California floater and/or<br />

its habitat and that this species should be considered when projects are planned which might<br />

cause erosion, siltation, or bedload movements in streams. Pending survey/inventory data from<br />

the project area documenting the absence of California floaters, documentation from WDFW or<br />

USFWS to the effect that baseline inventories of freshwater mussels in the project area have<br />

C-13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!