09.06.2015 Views

Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington

Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington

Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Condit</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> Hydroelectric Project<br />

Final Supplemental EIS<br />

The potential project-generated traffic volumes were distributed onto the surrounding<br />

roadway network for the beginning and ending trips per day because most of the internal<br />

trips are on private or local roadways. Peak hour traffic volumes that include the proposed<br />

project (a total of 34 vehicle trips) were developed.<br />

A peak hour LOS analysis for the roadway segments in the project area was undertaken. The<br />

results show that the small increase in traffic traveling to the study area as well as the<br />

intersection of SR 141/Powerhouse Road would cause little or no perceptible change to<br />

operations. As stated above, the maximum change would involve the addition of 9 truck<br />

trips and 25 vehicle trips (employees) traveling to the project site during the am and pm peak<br />

hours. This increase in truck and vehicle traffic only changes the operations minimally for<br />

any vehicle turning from Powerhouse Road onto SR 141 (the worst-case scenario).<br />

If concrete recycling occurs, the location of the recycling would be off-site, assumed to be<br />

within 30 miles. Under this scenario, the approximately 30,000 cubic yards of concrete<br />

would require 3,000 truck loads, assuming 10 yards per load. If that is distributed evenly<br />

over the 8-month deconstruction period, it would be less than 3 loads per hour entering SR<br />

141. The same number of empty trucks would return to the site. Those truck trips would be<br />

added to the vehicle trips noted above expected to travel on Powerhouse Road, SR 141 and<br />

SR 14. Under this scenario, the truck traffic would increase from 9 to 12 per hour. This<br />

change would not reduce the LOS on roadways and at intersections throughout the day. The<br />

additional trucks would slightly increase the potential for accidents.<br />

Parking/Staging<br />

Parking and staging areas would be necessary. Primary sites for staging are adjacent to<br />

Powerhouse Road next to the dam. These sites include an area occupied by a private<br />

residence (which would have to be purchased) and by a shed owned by PacifiCorp. There<br />

are additional small flat areas adjacent to access roads that would also be used as staging<br />

areas and parking areas. Areas would require the removal of existing buildings, clearing of<br />

vegetation, grading and gravelling (where necessary).<br />

Alternative <strong>Access</strong> Roads<br />

It is anticipated that alternative access roads would need to be constructed to allow access to<br />

different parts of the dam demolition. The project vehicle trip generation would be the same<br />

as described above. The building of alternative access points would still need to intersect<br />

Powerhouse Road or SR 141 at some point.<br />

An alternative access road for removal of the demolished dam materials would result in the<br />

same trip generation. It is anticipated that most truck trips would be from the dam site to a<br />

few thousand feet upstream, the proposed concrete disposal site.<br />

Post-<strong>Removal</strong> Management<br />

Due to the demolition of the dam, stability concerns concerning the Northwestern Lake Road<br />

bridge have been raised in a report by DCI Engineers (2004). Sediment around the H-piles<br />

would be washed away, resulting in a decrease in lateral load capacity and a decrease in axial<br />

load buckling strength, possibly resulting in a collapse of the bridge. Erosion of the banks<br />

4.6-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!