09.06.2015 Views

Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington

Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington

Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Condit</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> Hydroelectric Project<br />

Final Supplemental EIS<br />

The deposition of granular material in the in-lieu site and development of a stable channel<br />

may eventually provide a habitat similar to that which naturally occurred at the mouth of the<br />

White Salmon River before the creation of the Bonneville pool. It is likely that the majority<br />

of the production of fall-run Chinook salmon before the construction of <strong>Condit</strong> <strong>Dam</strong><br />

occurred in the lower 2.6 miles of the river and particularly in the low gradient reach near the<br />

mouth of the river. Juveniles produced in this stretch are limited to the habitat available<br />

below falls such as the one at RM 2.6 because they cannot ascend over any but the most<br />

minor falls.<br />

The banks of the channel created by the river down-cutting through sediments deposited at<br />

the in-lieu site also may e deep and have a very steep angle, well above the stable angle of<br />

repose. Bank sloughs can have lethal consequences for fish, as described above in the<br />

upstream sediment management section. The situation may be prevented if the dam is<br />

breached at a time when the Bonneville pool is at the low end of the range of pool depths.<br />

4.3.3 Cumulative Impacts<br />

The notable potential cumulative impacts from removal of the <strong>Condit</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> relate to<br />

management of the fish and fisheries in the river. The new fish stocks that will occur above<br />

the current dam site would undoubtedly attract fishermen. A definite potential exists for the<br />

fishermen to adversely affect resident trout populations while pursuing anadromous fish.<br />

This would be both an indirect and a cumulative impact, since fishermen currently catch<br />

resident trout in the reservoir and the river system above it. The impacts are manageable by<br />

WDFW fishing regulation modifications and enforcement. Therefore, there is no need to<br />

consider the effects to be either significant or unavoidable.<br />

The other potential adverse cumulative effect could result from supplemental hatchery<br />

actions that might be used to help the anadromous fish stocks to become established after the<br />

dam is removed. If fish stocks are brought in from elsewhere to get a start or supplement the<br />

establishment, there are risks of causing unintended adverse impacts on other stocks, such as<br />

interactions with residual steelhead, or introgression that might reduce their fitness, or<br />

outright competition. Specific measures can be taken to minimize or avoid such impacts<br />

(Nielsen 2005). Therefore, these effects also are avoidable or manageable to a level that<br />

would probably be insignificant. All such actions would be managed by the state and federal<br />

resource agencies responsible for the fish.<br />

There would also be long-term cumulative beneficial impacts, since there are regional efforts<br />

to recover populations of anadromous salmonids. The regional efforts would be furthered by<br />

the removal of <strong>Condit</strong> <strong>Dam</strong>.<br />

4.3.4 Mitigation Measures<br />

Pre-<strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Removal</strong> Activities<br />

Haul Roads, Staging Areas, and Disposal Sites<br />

• To reduce the delivery of fine sediments to the White River stream channel, areas<br />

where soil has been disturbed will be revegetated in accordance with the plan for<br />

4.3-26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!