09.06.2015 Views

Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington

Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington

Condit Dam Removal Condit Dam Removal - Access Washington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Condit</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> Hydroelectric Project<br />

Final Supplemental EIS<br />

4.10 AESTHETICS AND SCENIC RESOURCES<br />

This section evaluates Aesthetics and Scenic Resources that could be affected as a result of<br />

the proposed action. Recreational impacts and mitigation measures were addressed in<br />

previous FERC documents and are not addressed in this section. Other discussions related to<br />

aesthetics and scenic resources are included in Land Use/Critical Areas (Section 4.9) and<br />

Aquatic Resources (Section 4.3). A previous document entitled <strong>Condit</strong> Hydroelectric Project<br />

Visual Analysis (PacifiCorp 1991), prepared in conjunction with the FERC NEPA<br />

environmental process, is used as a reference for the analysis in this document. The previous<br />

documents followed the USFS Visual Management System, Existing Visual <strong>Condit</strong>ions<br />

(EVC) evaluation procedure. This method is used in this document.<br />

4.10.1 Affected Environment<br />

For the proposed action, the affected area analyzed is the area from Northwestern Lake<br />

(reservoir), extending about 1.8 miles from the dam to approximately the Northwestern Lake<br />

Road bridge. Other aesthetic and scenic resources in the vicinity include the Lower White<br />

Salmon National Wild and Scenic River area upstream of the reservoir and the Columbia<br />

Gorge National Scenic Area, which extends over virtually the entire proposed action area.<br />

The EVC evaluation procedure involves a comparison of the natural appearing landscape<br />

with degrees of differences in landscape alteration. Landscapes are classified into six types<br />

(Table 4.10-1).<br />

Table 4.10-1<br />

Existing Visual <strong>Condit</strong>ion Types<br />

Type I Areas in which only ecological change has taken place except for trails needed for access. They appear<br />

to be untouched by human activities.<br />

Type II Areas in which changes in the landscape are not visually evident to the average person unless pointed<br />

out. They are normally not noticed.<br />

Type III Areas in which changes in the landscape are noticed by the average forest visitor, but they do not attract<br />

attention. The natural appearance of the landscape still remains dominant. They appear to be minor<br />

disturbances.<br />

Type IV Areas in which changes in the landscape are easily noticed by the average forest visitor and may attract<br />

some attention.<br />

Type V Areas in which changes in the landscape are strong and are obvious to the average forest visitor. These<br />

changes stand out as a dominating impression of the landscape. They appear to be major disturbances.<br />

Type VI Areas in which changes in the landscape are in glaring contrast to the natural appearance. Almost all<br />

forest visitors would be displeased with the effect. They appear to be drastic disturbances.<br />

Source: USFS 1980<br />

The 2002 Final SEIS evaluated key areas along the reservoir. These areas included the<br />

<strong>Condit</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> and Forebay Boat Ramp, the Reservoir Shoreline, and Northwestern Lake Park<br />

(Figures 4.10-1 through 4.10-10 show the general areas).<br />

<strong>Condit</strong> <strong>Dam</strong>/Forebay Boat Ramp<br />

The dam is visible from the forebay boat ramp area, which is about 500 feet north of the dam.<br />

Public access is currently available to the dam via Powerhouse Road. Public access to the<br />

4.10-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!