13.06.2015 Views

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

KNOTS, LINKS AND KINKS<br />

131<br />

didn't you get mine?' He was given the best room in the hotel,<br />

and Air India put him in ®rst class on his ¯ight home to<br />

Rome.<br />

Thus was born what is now called loop quantum gravity. It<br />

took several years of work, ®rst with Carlo and then as part of<br />

a growing community of friends and colleagues, to unravel<br />

the meaning of the solutions to the quantum gravity equations<br />

we had found. One straightforward consequence is that<br />

quantum geometry is indeed discrete. Everything we had<br />

done had been based on the idea of a discrete line of force, as<br />

in a magnetic ®eld in a superconductor. Translated into the<br />

loop picture of the gravitational ®eld, this turns out to imply<br />

that the area of any surface comes in discrete multiples of<br />

simple units. The smallest of these units is about the Planck<br />

area, which is the square of the Planck length. This means that<br />

all surfaces are discrete, made of parts each of which carries a<br />

®nite amount of area. The same is true of volume.<br />

<strong>To</strong> arrive at these results we had to ®nd a way to eliminate<br />

the in®nities that plague all expressions in quantum theories<br />

of ®elds. I had an intuition, stemming from my past conversations<br />

with Julian Barbour, and the work I had done with<br />

Louis Crane, that the theory should have no in®nities. Many<br />

physicists have speculated that the in®nities come from some<br />

mistaken assumption about the structure of space and time on<br />

the Planck scale. From the older work it was clear to me that<br />

the wrong assumption was the idea that the geometry of<br />

spacetime was ®xed and non-dynamical. When calculating<br />

the measures of geometry, such as area and volume, one had<br />

to do it in just the right way to eliminate any possible contamination<br />

from non-dynamical, ®xed structures. Exactly<br />

how to do this was a technical exercise that cannot be<br />

explained here. But in the end it did turn out that as long as<br />

one asks a physically meaningful question, there will be no<br />

in®nities.<br />

In my experience it really is true that as a scientist one has<br />

only a few good ideas. They are few and far between, and<br />

come only after many years of preparation. What is worse,<br />

having had a good idea one is condemned to years of hard<br />

work developing it. The idea that area and volume would be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!