13.06.2015 Views

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

184 THREE ROADS TO QUANTUM GRAVITY<br />

make string theory truly a quantum theory of gravity. Loop<br />

quantum gravity is faced with the problem of how to show<br />

that a quantum spacetime described by an evolving spin<br />

network will grow into a large classical universe, which to a<br />

good approximation can be described in terms of ordinary<br />

geometry and Einstein's theory of general relativity. This<br />

problem arose in 1995 when Thomas Thiemann, a young<br />

German physicist then working at Harvard, presented for the<br />

®rst time a complete formulation of loop quantum gravity<br />

which resolved all the problems then known to exist.<br />

Thiemann's formulation built on all the previous work, to<br />

which he added some brilliant innovations of his own. The<br />

result was a complete theory which in principle should be<br />

able to answer any question. Furthermore, the theory could be<br />

derived directly from Einstein's general theory of relativity by<br />

following a well de®ned and mathematically rigorous procedure.<br />

As soon as we had the theory, we began calculating with it.<br />

The ®rst thing to calculate was how a graviton might appear<br />

as a description of a small wave or disturbance passing<br />

through a spin network. Before this could be done, however,<br />

we had to solve a more basic problem, which was to understand<br />

how the geometry of space and time, which seems so<br />

smooth and regular on the scales we can see, emerges from the<br />

atomic description in terms of spin networks. Until this was<br />

done we would not be able to make sense of what a graviton<br />

is, as gravitons should be related to waves in classical<br />

spacetime.<br />

This kind of problem, new to us, is very familiar to<br />

physicists who study materials. If I cup my hands together<br />

and dip them into a stream I can carry away only as much<br />

water as will ®ll the `cup'. But I can lift a block of ice just by<br />

holding it at its two sides. What is it about the different<br />

arrangements of the atoms in water and ice that accounts for<br />

the difference? Similarly, the spin networks that form the<br />

atomic structure of space can organize themselves in many<br />

different ways. Only a few of these ways will have a regular<br />

enough structure to reproduce the properties of space and<br />

time in our world.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!