13.06.2015 Views

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38 THREE ROADS TO QUANTUM GRAVITY<br />

This sounds crazy, and even thirty years after learning it I<br />

cannot describe this situation without a feeling of misgiving.<br />

Surely there must be a better way to understand what is going<br />

on here! Embarrassing though it is to admit it, no one has yet<br />

found a way to make sense of it that is both more comprehensible<br />

and elegant. (There are alternatives, but they are either<br />

comprehensible and inelegant, or the reverse.) However,<br />

there is a lot of experimental evidence for the superposition<br />

principle, including the double slit experiment and the<br />

Einstein±Podolsky±Rosen experiment. Interested readers<br />

can ®nd these discussed in many popular books, some of<br />

which are included in the reading list at the end of this<br />

book.<br />

The problem with quantum theory is that nothing in our<br />

experience behaves in the way the theory describes. All our<br />

perceptions are either of one thing or another ± A or B, tasty or<br />

yukky. We never perceive combinations of them, such as<br />

a 6 tasty + b 6 yukky. <strong>Quantum</strong> theory takes this into<br />

account. It says that what we observe will be tasty a certain<br />

proportion of the time, and yukky the rest of the time. The<br />

relative probabilities of us observing these two possibilities<br />

are given by the relative magnitudes of a 2 and b 2 . However,<br />

what is most crucial to take on board is that the statement that<br />

the system is in the state aA +bB does not mean that it is<br />

either A or B, with some probability of being A and some<br />

other probability of being B. That is what we see if we observe<br />

it, but that is not what it is. We know this because the<br />

superposition aA +bB can have properties that neither tasty<br />

nor yukky have by themselves.<br />

There is a paradox here. Were my cat to be described in the<br />

language of quantum theory, after tasting the mouse she<br />

would experience either tasty or yukky. But according to<br />

quantum mechanics she would not be in a de®nite state of<br />

happy or displeased. She would go into a superposition of<br />

two states which mirrors the possible states of the mouse. She<br />

would be suspended in a superposition of a happy state and<br />

an annoyed-for-having-bitten-into-a-yukky-mouse state.<br />

So the cat experiences herself in a de®nite state, but in the<br />

light of quantum theory I must see her in a superposition.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!