Three Roads To Quantum Gravity
Three Roads To Quantum Gravity
Three Roads To Quantum Gravity
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
38 THREE ROADS TO QUANTUM GRAVITY<br />
This sounds crazy, and even thirty years after learning it I<br />
cannot describe this situation without a feeling of misgiving.<br />
Surely there must be a better way to understand what is going<br />
on here! Embarrassing though it is to admit it, no one has yet<br />
found a way to make sense of it that is both more comprehensible<br />
and elegant. (There are alternatives, but they are either<br />
comprehensible and inelegant, or the reverse.) However,<br />
there is a lot of experimental evidence for the superposition<br />
principle, including the double slit experiment and the<br />
Einstein±Podolsky±Rosen experiment. Interested readers<br />
can ®nd these discussed in many popular books, some of<br />
which are included in the reading list at the end of this<br />
book.<br />
The problem with quantum theory is that nothing in our<br />
experience behaves in the way the theory describes. All our<br />
perceptions are either of one thing or another ± A or B, tasty or<br />
yukky. We never perceive combinations of them, such as<br />
a 6 tasty + b 6 yukky. <strong>Quantum</strong> theory takes this into<br />
account. It says that what we observe will be tasty a certain<br />
proportion of the time, and yukky the rest of the time. The<br />
relative probabilities of us observing these two possibilities<br />
are given by the relative magnitudes of a 2 and b 2 . However,<br />
what is most crucial to take on board is that the statement that<br />
the system is in the state aA +bB does not mean that it is<br />
either A or B, with some probability of being A and some<br />
other probability of being B. That is what we see if we observe<br />
it, but that is not what it is. We know this because the<br />
superposition aA +bB can have properties that neither tasty<br />
nor yukky have by themselves.<br />
There is a paradox here. Were my cat to be described in the<br />
language of quantum theory, after tasting the mouse she<br />
would experience either tasty or yukky. But according to<br />
quantum mechanics she would not be in a de®nite state of<br />
happy or displeased. She would go into a superposition of<br />
two states which mirrors the possible states of the mouse. She<br />
would be suspended in a superposition of a happy state and<br />
an annoyed-for-having-bitten-into-a-yukky-mouse state.<br />
So the cat experiences herself in a de®nite state, but in the<br />
light of quantum theory I must see her in a superposition.