13.06.2015 Views

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HOW TO WEAVE A STRING<br />

183<br />

other. They wrote to each other about the telescope and what<br />

it revealed, but Galileo seems never to have mentioned<br />

ellipses, and to have gone to his grave believing the planetary<br />

orbits were circles. Nor is there any evidence that Kepler ever<br />

thought about falling bodies or believed them to be relevant to<br />

explaining the motions of the planets. It took a young scientist<br />

of a later generation, Isaac Newton, born the year of Galileo's<br />

death, to wonder whether the same force that made apples fall<br />

drew the Moon to the Earth and the planets to the Sun. So,<br />

while my story is fanciful, it really did happen that scientists<br />

with the stature of Galileo and Kepler each contributed an<br />

essential ingredient to a scienti®c revolution while remaining<br />

almost ignorant of and apparently uninterested in each<br />

other's discoveries.<br />

We can hope that it will take less time to bring the different<br />

pieces of the quantum theory of gravity together than it did for<br />

someone to see the relationship between the work of Kepler<br />

and Galileo. The simple reason is that there are many more<br />

scientists working now than there were then. Whereas Kepler<br />

and Galileo might each have complained, if asked, that they<br />

were too busy to look at what the other was doing, there are<br />

now plenty of people to share the work. However, there is<br />

now the problem of making sure that young people have the<br />

freedom to wander across boundaries established by their<br />

elders without fear of jeopardizing their careers. It would be<br />

naive to say this is not a signi®cant issue. In many areas of<br />

science we are paying for the consequences of an academic<br />

system that rewards narrowness of focus over exploration of<br />

new areas. This underlines the fact that good science is, and<br />

will always be, as much a question of judgement and<br />

character as it is a question of cleverness.<br />

Indeed, over the last ®ve years the climate of mutual<br />

ignorance and complacency that separated the string theorists<br />

from the loop quantum gravity people has begun to dissipate.<br />

The reason is that it has been becoming increasingly clear that<br />

each group has a problem it cannot solve. For string theory it<br />

is the problem of making the theory background independent<br />

and ®nding out what M theory really is. This is necessary both<br />

to unify the different string theories into a single theory and to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!