Three Roads To Quantum Gravity
Three Roads To Quantum Gravity
Three Roads To Quantum Gravity
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HOW TO WEAVE A STRING<br />
183<br />
other. They wrote to each other about the telescope and what<br />
it revealed, but Galileo seems never to have mentioned<br />
ellipses, and to have gone to his grave believing the planetary<br />
orbits were circles. Nor is there any evidence that Kepler ever<br />
thought about falling bodies or believed them to be relevant to<br />
explaining the motions of the planets. It took a young scientist<br />
of a later generation, Isaac Newton, born the year of Galileo's<br />
death, to wonder whether the same force that made apples fall<br />
drew the Moon to the Earth and the planets to the Sun. So,<br />
while my story is fanciful, it really did happen that scientists<br />
with the stature of Galileo and Kepler each contributed an<br />
essential ingredient to a scienti®c revolution while remaining<br />
almost ignorant of and apparently uninterested in each<br />
other's discoveries.<br />
We can hope that it will take less time to bring the different<br />
pieces of the quantum theory of gravity together than it did for<br />
someone to see the relationship between the work of Kepler<br />
and Galileo. The simple reason is that there are many more<br />
scientists working now than there were then. Whereas Kepler<br />
and Galileo might each have complained, if asked, that they<br />
were too busy to look at what the other was doing, there are<br />
now plenty of people to share the work. However, there is<br />
now the problem of making sure that young people have the<br />
freedom to wander across boundaries established by their<br />
elders without fear of jeopardizing their careers. It would be<br />
naive to say this is not a signi®cant issue. In many areas of<br />
science we are paying for the consequences of an academic<br />
system that rewards narrowness of focus over exploration of<br />
new areas. This underlines the fact that good science is, and<br />
will always be, as much a question of judgement and<br />
character as it is a question of cleverness.<br />
Indeed, over the last ®ve years the climate of mutual<br />
ignorance and complacency that separated the string theorists<br />
from the loop quantum gravity people has begun to dissipate.<br />
The reason is that it has been becoming increasingly clear that<br />
each group has a problem it cannot solve. For string theory it<br />
is the problem of making the theory background independent<br />
and ®nding out what M theory really is. This is necessary both<br />
to unify the different string theories into a single theory and to